Rivka Spivak v. Google LLC, et al
| ROE, Business Entities I through X, ALPHABET INC., MAX RAYMOND CHO, SHAWN JASON BAYERN, DOES, 1 through X, RAYMOND LESLIE BLESSEY, DIANA RUTH SHERMAN, AYAN RAY KAYAL, DAVID ANDREW RUSSCOL, FACEBOOK INC. and ALPHABET, INC. |
| RIVKA SPIVAK, AKA Rebecca Spivak |
| BRIAN L. JOHNSRUD and GOOGLE LLC, subsidiary of Alphabet Inc. |
| 21-35165 |
| March 3, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: LK): Appellants opposed motion (Docket Entry No. [ # 2 ]) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted in part. The opening brief is now due August 3, 2021. The answering brief is due September 2, 2021. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12089742] (JBS) [Entered: 04/28/2021 11:30 AM] |
| Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Appellees Google LLC and Brian L. Johnsrud response to motion ([ # 2 ] Party Motion). Date of service: 04/23/2021. [12085454] [21-35165] (Hade, Kellen) [Entered: 04/23/2021 03:13 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed Appellant Rivka Spivak motion to extend time to file appellant opening brief. Deficiencies: None [12077228] (NAC) [Entered: 04/16/2021 11:56 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Rivka Spivak opening brief due 05/05/2021. Appellees Google LLC and Brian L. Johnsrud answering brief due 06/07/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12022622] (RT) [Entered: 03/03/2021 10:08 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
