Nathan Pierce, et al v. Christi Jacobsen, et al
MONTANA COALITION FOR RIGHTS, LIBERTY INITIATIVE FUND, SHERRI FERRELL, MONTANANS FOR CITIZEN VOTING and NATHAN PIERCE |
AUSTIN KNUDSEN, in his official capacity as the Attorney General of the State of Montana, CHRISTI JACOBSEN, in her official capacity as the Secretary of State for the State of Montana and JEFF MANGAN, in his official capacity as the Commissioner of the Montana Commission on Political Practices |
21-35173 |
March 5, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
NATHAN PIERCE V. CHRISTI JACOBSEN |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Streamlined request [6] by Appellants Sherri Ferrell, Liberty Initiative Fund, Montana Coalition for Rights, Montanans for Citizen Voting and Nathan Pierce to extend time to file the brief is approved. Amended briefing schedule: Appellants Sherri Ferrell, Liberty Initiative Fund, Montana Coalition for Rights, Montanans for Citizen Voting and Nathan Pierce opening brief due 06/02/2021. Appellees Christi Jacobsen, Austin Knudsen and Jeff Mangan answering brief due 07/02/2021. The optional reply brief is due 21 days from the date of service of the answering brief. [12090497] (JN) [Entered: 04/28/2021 05:16 PM] |
Filing 6 Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Opening Brief by Appellants Sherri Ferrell, Liberty Initiative Fund, Montana Coalition for Rights, Montanans for Citizen Voting and Nathan Pierce. New requested due date is 06/02/2021. [12089612] [21-35173] (Rossi, Paul) [Entered: 04/28/2021 10:49 AM] |
Filing 5 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. [12062158] (VS) [Entered: 04/02/2021 01:47 PM] |
Filing 4 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 03/24/2021. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12052698]. [21-35173] (AD) [Entered: 03/25/2021 06:44 AM] |
Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Appellants Sherri Ferrell, Liberty Initiative Fund, Montana Coalition for Rights, Montanans for Citizen Voting and Nathan Pierce Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 03/24/2021. [12052668] [21-35173] (Rossi, Paul) [Entered: 03/24/2021 09:15 PM] |
Filing 2 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: The court of appeals' records do not indicate that appellant has filed a mediation questionnaire in accordance with Cir. R. 3-4. Within seven (7) days of the filing date of this order, appellant shall file a Mediation Questionnaire or dismiss the appeal voluntarily. [12046218] (LW) [Entered: 03/18/2021 02:15 PM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellants Sherri Ferrell, Liberty Initiative Fund, Montana Coalition for Rights, Montanans for Citizen Voting and Nathan Pierce Mediation Questionnaire due on 03/12/2021. Appellants Sherri Ferrell, Liberty Initiative Fund, Montana Coalition for Rights, Montanans for Citizen Voting and Nathan Pierce opening brief due 05/03/2021. Appellees Christi Jacobsen, Austin Knudsen and Jeff Mangan answering brief due 06/02/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12025704] (JBS) [Entered: 03/05/2021 10:37 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.