Chad Bock, et al v. State of Washington, et al
DAN RAHN, WDFW Captain, JOLYNN BEAUCHENE, WDFW Officer, JESSE JONES, MIKE SPRECHER, WDFW Sargent, STATE OF WASHINGTON and WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE |
CHAD BOCK, a single man and NATHAN BOCK |
21-35182 |
March 11, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant settlement discussions while the appeal is pending. The briefing schedule previously established by the court remains in effect. [12061562] (LW) [Entered: 04/02/2021 08:54 AM] |
Filing 8 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: By 03/31/2021, counsel to email Circuit Mediator regarding settlement potential. Include Ninth Circuit case number in subject line. This communication will be kept confidential, if requested, and should not be filed with the court. The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. [12048468] (LW) [Entered: 03/22/2021 08:58 AM] |
Filing 7 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 03/19/2021. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12048203]. [21-35182] (AD) [Entered: 03/19/2021 06:44 PM] |
Filing 6 Filed (ECF) Appellee Jesse Jones Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 03/19/2021. [12048039] [21-35182] (Gill, Paul) [Entered: 03/19/2021 04:00 PM] |
Filing 5 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 03/18/2021. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12046858]. [21-35182] (AD) [Entered: 03/18/2021 06:44 PM] |
Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Appellants Chad Bock and Nathan Bock Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 03/18/2021. [12046715] [21-35182] (Harris, Mark) [Entered: 03/18/2021 04:47 PM] |
Filing 3 Added Attorney(s) Morgan C. Maxey for party(s) Appellant Nathan Bock and Appellant Chad Bock, in case 21-35182. [12046695] (QDL) [Entered: 03/18/2021 04:44 PM] |
Filing 2 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Morgan Cari Maxey (Maxey Law Office PLLC 1835 W. Broadway Ave. Spokane WA 99201) for Appellants Chad Bock and Nathan Bock. Date of service: 03/18/2021. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12046682] [21-35182] (Maxey, Morgan) [Entered: 03/18/2021 04:38 PM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellants Chad Bock and Nathan Bock Mediation Questionnaire due on 03/18/2021. Appellants Chad Bock and Nathan Bock opening brief due 05/10/2021. Appellees Jolynn Beauchene, Jesse Jones, Dan Rahn, Mike Sprecher, State of Washington and Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife answering brief due 06/07/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12031937] (JPD) [Entered: 03/11/2021 09:41 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.