Lori Wakefield v. ViSalus, Inc.
Defendant / Appellant: VISALUS, INC., a Nevada corporation
Plaintiff / Appellee: LORI WAKEFIELD, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Case Number: 21-35201
Filed: March 18, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
October 20, 2022 Summary LORI WAKEFIELD V. VISALUS, INC.

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 19, 2021 Filing 12 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 05/19/2021, 9:30 a.m. PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [12079766] (BLS) [Entered: 04/19/2021 04:56 PM]
April 13, 2021 Filing 11 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 04/13/2021. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12072635]. [21-35201] (AD) [Entered: 04/13/2021 12:44 PM]
April 13, 2021 Filing 10 Filed (ECF) Appellant ViSalus, Inc. Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 04/13/2021. [12072592] [21-35201] (James, Becky) [Entered: 04/13/2021 12:15 PM]
April 8, 2021 Filing 9 Added Attorney(s) Scott Kocher for party(s) Appellee Lori Wakefield, in case 21-35201. [12067999] (RR) [Entered: 04/08/2021 12:50 PM]
April 8, 2021 Filing 8 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Scott F. Kocher (Forum Law Group LLC, 811 SW Naito Parkway, Suite 420, Portland, OR 97204) for Appellee Lori Wakefield. Date of service: 04/08/2021. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12067976] [21-35201] (Kocher, Scott) [Entered: 04/08/2021 12:28 PM]
April 1, 2021 Filing 7 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: The court of appeals' records do not indicate that appellant has filed a mediation questionnaire in accordance with Cir. R. 3-4. Within seven (7) days of the filing date of this order, appellant shall file a Mediation Questionnaire or dismiss the appeal voluntarily. [12060741] (LW) [Entered: 04/01/2021 12:08 PM]
March 29, 2021 Filing 6 Added Attorney(s) Ryan D. Andrews for party(s) Appellee Lori Wakefield, in case 21-35201. [12055938] (DJV) [Entered: 03/29/2021 09:11 AM]
March 29, 2021 Filing 5 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Ryan D. Andrews (Edelson PC) for Appellee Lori Wakefield. Date of service: 03/29/2021. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12055851] [21-35201] (Andrews, Ryan) [Entered: 03/29/2021 08:39 AM]
March 24, 2021 Filing 4 Terminated Stephen C. Voorhees for Lori Wakefield in 21-35201 (added in error during case opening). [12052069] (RY) [Entered: 03/24/2021 01:18 PM]
March 24, 2021 Filing 3 Attorney Benjamin G. Shatz in 21-35201 substituted by Attorney Becky S. James in 21-35201 [12051829] (DJV) [Entered: 03/24/2021 11:13 AM]
March 24, 2021 Filing 2 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Becky S. James (James & Associates, 4500 Park Granada, Calabasas, CA 91302) for Appellant ViSalus, Inc.. Substitution for Benjamin G. Shatz for Appellant ViSalus, Inc., Mr. Nicholas Hanson Pyle for Appellant ViSalus, Inc., Joshua Michio Sasaki for Appellant ViSalus, Inc. and Ms. Christine Marie Reilly, Esquire for Appellant ViSalus, Inc.. Date of service: 03/24/2021. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12051820] [21-35201] (James, Becky) [Entered: 03/24/2021 11:07 AM]
March 18, 2021 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant ViSalus, Inc. Mediation Questionnaire due on 03/25/2021. Transcript ordered by 04/15/2021. Transcript due 05/17/2021. Appellant ViSalus, Inc. opening brief due 06/24/2021. Appellee Lori Wakefield answering brief due 07/26/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12046209] (RT) [Entered: 03/18/2021 02:12 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Lori Wakefield v. ViSalus, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: VISALUS, INC., a Nevada corporation
Represented By: Benjamin G. Shatz
Represented By: Joshua Michio Sasaki
Represented By: Christine Marie Reilly Esquire
Represented By: Nicholas Hanson Pyle
Represented By: Becky S. James
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: LORI WAKEFIELD, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Represented By: John Aaron Lawson
Represented By: Rafey S. Balabanian
Represented By: Gregory Scott Dovel
Represented By: Jay Edelson
Represented By: Stephen C. Voorhees
Represented By: Benjamin H. Richman
Represented By: Scott Kocher
Represented By: Ryan D. Andrews
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?