Brandy Sandoval v. Poe, et al
| DOUGLAS COUNTY JAIL AND STAFF |
| TURNER, Sargeant, OSBORNE, PIERCE, Deputy, WADE, Deputy, CHILDER'S, Deputy, CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, KELLY, Deputy, POE, Deputy, EGGLESTON, Deputy, DWIGHT, Deputy, MCIRVIN and TRACY |
| BRANDY MARIE SANDOVAL |
| 21-35214 |
| March 24, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 11, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 MANDATE ISSUED. (RRC, MHM and DAB) [12108598] (DJV) [Entered: 05/11/2021 08:06 AM] |
| Filing 3 Filed order (RICHARD R. CLIFTON, MARY H. MURGUIA and DANIEL A. BRESS) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the notice of appeal does not challenge any final or appealable orders of the district court. See 28 U.S.C. 1291. Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. All pending motions are denied as moot. DISMISSED. [12079478] (WL) [Entered: 04/19/2021 03:21 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed Appellant Brandy Marie Sandoval motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 04/12/2021. [12077439] (DJV) [Entered: 04/16/2021 01:27 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Brandy Marie Sandoval opening brief due 05/26/2021. Appellees Childer's, Correct Care Solutions, Dwight, Eggleston, Kelly, McIrvin, Osborne, Pierce, Poe, Tracy, Turner and Wade answering brief due 06/28/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12052229] (RT) [Entered: 03/24/2021 02:39 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
