Eric Moutal, et al v. Exel, Inc.
| EXEL, INC., a foreign corporation |
| ANDREA NEWMAN and ERIC MOUTAL |
| 21-35303 |
| April 21, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Filed order MEDIATION (RGA): A dial-in telephone conference, with counsel for appellant only, will be held on July 13, 2021, at 2:30 p.m. Pacific Time. A dial-in telephone conference, with counsel for appellees only, will be held on July 13, 2021, at 3:00 p.m. Pacific Time. Each participant will receive an email with dial-in information. The briefing schedule previously set by the court is amended as follows: appellant's opening brief is due August 30, 2021; appellees' answering brief is due September 29, 2021; appellant's optional reply brief is due within 21 days from the service date of the answering brief. [12140322] (AF) [Entered: 06/10/2021 11:09 AM] |
| Filing 4 Filed order MEDIATION (VS): The Mediation Program of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals facilitates settlement while appeals are pending. See Fed. R. App. P. 33 and Ninth Cir. R. 33-1. The court has scheduled a dial-in telephone assessment conference with counsel and Circuit Mediator Roxane Ashe at the date and time indicated above to explore settlement potential. Each attorney on the attached list of participants will receive an email with dial-in information. If there are any changes or additions to the list, please notify the Mediation Office at mediation@ca9.uscourts.gov. Also, if counsel has an unavoidable scheduling conflict, please notify Circuit Mediator Roxane Ashe immediately by email (roxane_ashe@ca9.uscourts.gov) and copy all counsel on any such communications. All emails should include the Ninth Circuit case name and number in the subject line. All discussions that take place in the context of the assessment conference are confidential. See Circuit Rule 33-1. For more detailed information about the assessment conference, confidentiality, and the Mediation Program and its procedures generally, please see the attachment to this order and the Mediation Program web site: www.ca9.uscourts.gov/mediation. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. Date: June 9, 2021 Time: 11:00 a.m. Pacific Time) (SEE ORDER FOR FULL TEXT) [12100458] (AF) [Entered: 05/03/2021 04:09 PM] |
| Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 04/28/2021. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12089905]. [21-35303] (AD) [Entered: 04/28/2021 12:44 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant Exel, Inc. Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 04/28/2021. [12089856] [21-35303] (Miller, Jeffry) [Entered: 04/28/2021 12:15 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Exel, Inc. Mediation Questionnaire due on 04/28/2021. Transcript ordered by 05/20/2021. Transcript due 06/21/2021. Appellant Exel, Inc. opening brief due 07/29/2021. Appellees Eric Moutal and Andrea Newman answering brief due 08/30/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12081957] (JBS) [Entered: 04/21/2021 10:09 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
