Luna Eclips v. Scott Williams, et al
EARL HOUSER, BROWN, Sgt, FORSTER, Sgt., YARNOT, CONN, Sgt., RICHARD ROE, SCOTT WILLIAMS and NANCY DAHLSTROM |
LUNA ECLIPS, "flesh & blood" True & Proper Name-Sui Juris |
21-35353 |
May 6, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 Mail returned on 06/22/2021 addressed to Luna Eclips, re: [ # 8 ] Clerk Order. Returned envelope notes: Return to sender, inmate refused. Resending to: case files; appellant refused service [12151336] (JBS) [Entered: 06/22/2021 04:05 PM] |
Filing 9 Filed Appellant Luna Eclips notice to Ct of DOC denying access. Dated 06/03/2021. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12143619] (RL) [Entered: 06/14/2021 03:00 PM] |
Filing 8 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: AT): A review of the record reflects that this appeal may be frivolous. This court may dismiss a case at any time, if the court determines the case is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days after the date of this order, appellant must: (1) file a motion to dismiss this appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), OR (2) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. If appellant does not respond to this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute, without further notice. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellant files a motion to dismiss the appeal, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). If appellant submits any response to this order other than a motion to dismiss the appeal, the court may dismiss this appeal as frivolous, without further notice. If the court dismisses the appeal as frivolous, this appeal may be counted as a strike under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). All pending motions will be addressed, if necessary, after appellant responds to this order. The briefing schedule for this appeal remains stayed. The Clerk shall serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, and (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward. Appellant may use the enclosed forms for any motion to dismiss this appeal or statement that the appeal should go forward. [12140377] (JBS) [Entered: 06/10/2021 11:37 AM] |
Filing 7 Filed Appellant Luna Eclips FORM 27 motion for subpoena to produce discovery. Deficiencies: None. Served on 05/21/2021. [12131937] (RL) [Entered: 06/02/2021 04:41 PM] |
Filing 6 Filed Appellant Luna Eclips FORM 4 motion and affidavit for permission to proceed in forma pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 05/21/2021. [12131931] (RL) [Entered: 06/02/2021 04:39 PM] |
Filing 5 Filed Appellant Luna Eclips letter dated 05/19/2021 re: Alaska Department of Corrections at Goose Creek are denying me access to law research computer. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12127228] (RL) [Entered: 05/27/2021 03:05 PM] |
Filing 4 Filed Appellant Luna Eclips letter dated 05/20/2021 re: Request for court to assist with return of all files seized from staff. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12126413] (RL) [Entered: 05/27/2021 09:23 AM] |
Filing 3 Filed Appellant Luna Eclips notice of additional defendant. Dated 05/15/2021. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12122593] (RL) [Entered: 05/24/2021 02:11 PM] |
Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CKP): Order to show cause docket fee due [12109920] (CKP) [Entered: 05/12/2021 12:17 AM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Luna Eclips opening brief due 07/08/2021. [12104556] (RT) [Entered: 05/06/2021 12:23 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.