Robert Bondick v. Viriam Khalsa, et al
| THOMSON LANDSCAPE COMPANY, Landscape Company, CAMBRIDGE REAL ESTATE SERVICES, Property Management of Greenleaf Apartments and ROBIN SPENCER, Apartment Manager for Carbridge Real Estate Services |
| ROBERT BONDICK |
| HOMES FOR GOOD HOUSING AGENCY, VIRIAM K. KHALSA, Hearings Officer (Homes for Good Housing), JACOB FOX, Executive Director of Homes for Good and CHRISTI CAMP, Rent Assistance Supervisor of Homes for Good |
| 21-35410 |
| May 28, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CO): A review of the district courts docket reflects that the district court has certified that this appeal is frivolous and has revoked appellants in forma pauperis status. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a). This court may dismiss a case at any time, if the court determines the case is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days after the date of this order, appellant must: (1) file a motion to dismiss this appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), or (2) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. If appellant does not respond to this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute, without further notice. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellant files a motion to dismiss the appeal, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). If appellant submits any response to this order other than a motion to dismiss the appeal, the court may dismiss this appeal as frivolous, without further notice. If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellees may file a response within 10 days after service of appellants statement The briefing schedule for this appeal is stayed. The Clerk shall serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, and (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward. Appellant may use the enclosed forms for any motion to dismiss the appeal or statement that the appeal should go forward. [12185759] (CKP) [Entered: 07/28/2021 02:18 PM] |
| Filing 9 Fee status changed ( [Case Number 21-35410: Due] ). [12181270] (DJV) [Entered: 07/23/2021 11:29 AM] |
| Filing 8 Received copy of District Court order filed on 07/22/2021 revoking IFP status [12181265] (DJV) [Entered: 07/23/2021 11:28 AM] |
| Filing 7 Filed (ECF) Appellant Robert Bondick response to Court order dated 07/06/2021. Date of service: 07/20/2021. [12177835] [21-35410] --[COURT UPDATE: Updated docket text to reflect correct ECF filing type. 7/20/2021 by TYL] (Bondick, Robert) [Entered: 07/20/2021 01:00 PM] |
| Filing 6 Filed referral notice (Deputy Clerk:CKP): Referring to the district court for determination whether in forma pauperis status should continue for this appeal. [12166733] (CKP) [Entered: 07/08/2021 01:35 PM] |
| Filing 5 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant settlement discussions while the appeal is pending. [12163000] (BLS) [Entered: 07/06/2021 09:49 AM] |
| Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Appellant Robert Bondick Correspondence: Transcript of Settelement Hearing. Date of service: 06/27/2021. [12155472] [21-35410] --[COURT UPDATE: Updated docket text to reflect correct ECF filing type. 6/28/2021 by TYL] (Bondick, Robert) [Entered: 06/27/2021 04:17 AM] |
| Filing 3 Attorney Jens Schmidt substituted by Attorneys Andrea D. Coit in 21-35410 [12142356] (RT) [Entered: 06/11/2021 04:07 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed order MEDIATION (JW): The Mediation Program of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals facilitates settlement while appeals are pending. See Fed. R. App. P. 33 and Ninth Cir. R. 33-1. As part of a pilot project, the Mediation Program is exploring settlement potential in some cases in which one party is proceeding pro se (representing themselves without the assistance of an attorney). This case is being included in the pilot project. By June 30, 2021, the parties are requested to inform the Circuit Mediator in writing whether the issues on appeal or the underlying dispute might be appropriate for settlement discussions. The written response to this order and all future written or spoken communication with the mediator are strictly confidential mediation communications protected by Ninth Circuit Rule 33-1 and cannot be disclosed outside the mediation process. The written response to this order should not be filed with the court; instead, the response should be sent directly to the Circuit Mediator by email (Jonathan_Westen@ca9.uscourts.gov) or mail (Jonathan Westen, Circuit Mediation Office, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, James R. Browning United States Courthouse, P.O. Box 193939, San Francisco, CA 94119-3939). More detailed information about the Mediation Program and its procedures are included in the attachment to this order and on the Mediation Program web site (www.ca9.uscourts.gov/mediation). The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. [12139030] (AF) [Entered: 06/09/2021 01:36 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Transcript ordered by 06/28/2021. Transcript due 07/26/2021. Appellant Robert Bondick opening brief due 09/07/2021. Appellees Christi Camp, Jacob Fox, Homes for Good Housing Agency and Viriam K. Khalsa answering brief due 10/07/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12128577] (RT) [Entered: 05/28/2021 03:58 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
