Andrew Moret v. Poornima Ranganathan, et al
| OREGON STATE HOSPITAL |
| POORNIMA RANGANATHAN and ANDREA DAILEY |
| ANDREW GUY MORET |
| 21-35424 |
| June 3, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| ANDREW MORET V. POORNIMA RANGANATHAN |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 Attorney Denise Gale Fjordbeck in 21-35424 substituted by Attorney Patrick Michael Ebbett in 21-35424 [12174557] (RR) [Entered: 07/16/2021 11:02 AM] |
| Filing 16 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Patrick M. Ebbett (Oregon Department of Justice - Appellate Division, 1162 Court Street NE, Salem, Oregon 97301) for Appellees Andrea Dailey and Poornima Ranganathan. Substitution for Attorney Ms. Denise Gale Fjordbeck for Appellees Andrea Dailey and Poornima Ranganathan. Date of service: 07/16/2021. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12174297] [21-35424] (Ebbett, Patrick) [Entered: 07/16/2021 08:57 AM] |
| Filing 14 CLERK ORDER FILED (Deputy Clerk CKP) Prisoner completed authorization fee order. [12172745] (CKP) [Entered: 07/14/2021 03:31 PM] |
| Filing 15 Received PLRA authorization response from appellant. Dated 06/27/2021. [12173262] (RR) [Entered: 07/15/2021 10:19 AM] |
| Filing 13 Filed original and 0 copies of Appellant Andrew Guy Moret opening brief of 17 pages (Informal: No). Served on 07/09/2021. [12171446] (KWG) [Entered: 07/13/2021 03:09 PM] |
| Filing 12 Received PLRA authorization response from appellant and request for waiver of filings fees. Dated 06/27/2021. [12166620] (RR) [Entered: 07/08/2021 12:18 PM] |
| Filing 11 Filed Appellant Andrew Guy Moret letter dated 06/10/2021 re: IFP motion. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12152538] (RR) [Entered: 06/23/2021 03:27 PM] |
| Filing 10 Filed order (Appellate Commissioner): Appellants motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Docket Entry No. [ # 8 ]) is granted. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1) and (2), however, appellant eventually must pay the full amount of the filing and docketing fees for this appeal. Within 21 days of this order, appellant must complete and file with this court the enclosed prisoner authorization form, which directs prison officials at appellants institution to assess, collect, and forward to the court the $505.00 filing and docketing fees for this appeal on a monthly basis whenever funds exist in appellants trust fund account. These fees will continue to be collected regardlessof the date or manner of disposition of this appeal. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(2), (e)(2). If appellant fails to comply with this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. The opening brief is due August 2, 2021. The answering brief is due September 1, 2021. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. Because appellant is proceeding without counsel, appellant is not required to file excerpts of record. See 9th Cir. R. 30-1.3. Unless appellant does file excerpts of record, appellees must file Supplemental Excerpts of Record that contain all of the documents that are cited in the pro se opening brief or otherwise required by Rule 30-1.4, as well as the documents that are cited in the answering brief. See id. The Clerk will serve this order and a prisoner authorization form on appellant. (MOATT) [12148973] (WL) [Entered: 06/21/2021 10:40 AM] |
| Filing 8 Filed Appellant Andrew Guy Moret motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. [12145377] (RR) [Entered: 06/15/2021 04:55 PM] |
| Filing 9 Filed Appellant Andrew Guy Moret letter dated 06/09/2021 re: docketing and filing fees (filed IFP motion). Paper filing deficiency: None. [12145696] (RR) [Entered: 06/16/2021 09:41 AM] |
| Filing 7 Attorney Vanessa A. Nordyke and Robert E. Sullivan substituted by Attorney Denise Gale Fjordbeck. [12139256] (RL) [Entered: 06/09/2021 02:47 PM] |
| Filing 6 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Denise G. Fjordbeck (Oregon Department of Justice - Appellate Division, 1162 Court Street NE, Salem, Oregon 97301) for Appellees Andrea Dailey and Poornima Ranganathan. Substitution for Vanessa A. Nordyke, Esquire for Appellees Andrea Dailey and Poornima Ranganathan and Robert E. Sullivan, Esquire for Appellees Andrea Dailey and Poornima Ranganathan. Date of service: 06/09/2021. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12139224] [21-35424] (Fjordbeck, Denise) [Entered: 06/09/2021 02:40 PM] |
| Filing 5 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 06/02/2021. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12138930]. [21-35424] (AD) [Entered: 06/09/2021 12:44 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CKP): Order to show cause docket fee due [12136273] (CKP) [Entered: 06/07/2021 02:58 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Andrew Guy Moret opening brief due 08/02/2021. Appellees Andrea Dailey and Poornima Ranganathan answering brief due 08/31/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12133009] (WL) [Entered: 06/03/2021 02:52 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
