Lonnie Tofsrud v. City of Spokane, et al
| CITY OF SPOKANE, a municipal corporation in the State of Washington, JUSTIN LUNDGREN, in his personal and official capacity, DAVE STABEN, in his personal and official capacity and CRAIG MEIDL, in his personal and official capacity |
| LONNIE TOFSRUD, an individual |
| 21-35450 |
| June 11, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| LONNIE TOFSRUD V. CITY OF SPOKANE |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant settlement discussions while the appeal is pending. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. [12191670] (LW) [Entered: 08/04/2021 10:47 AM] |
| Filing 7 Attorney Thomas W. McLane substituted by Attorneys Taki V. Flevaris and Gregory J. Wong. [12163643] (RL) [Entered: 07/06/2021 02:02 PM] |
| Filing 6 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Gregory J. Wong (Pacifica Law Group 1191 2nd Avenue, Suite 2000 Seattle, WA 98101-3404) for Appellees City of Spokane, Justin Lundgren, Craig Meidl and Dave Staben. Substitution for Attorney Thomas W. McLane, Esquire for Appellees City of Spokane, Justin Lundgren, Craig Meidl and Dave Staben. Date of service: 07/06/2021. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12163601] [21-35450] (Wong, Gregory) [Entered: 07/06/2021 01:52 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Taki V. Flevaris (Pacifica Law Group 1191 2nd Avenue, Suite 2000 Seattle, WA 98101) for Appellees City of Spokane, Justin Lundgren, Craig Meidl and Dave Staben. Substitution for Attorney Thomas W. McLane, Esquire for Appellees City of Spokane, Justin Lundgren, Craig Meidl and Dave Staben. Date of service: 07/06/2021. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12163594] [21-35450] (Flevaris, Taki) [Entered: 07/06/2021 01:50 PM] |
| Filing 4 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL IN AssessmentConference, 07/28/2021, 09:00 a.m., PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [12153331] (LW) [Entered: 06/24/2021 11:43 AM] |
| Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 06/18/2021. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12148220]. [21-35450] (AD) [Entered: 06/18/2021 06:44 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant Lonnie Tofsrud Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 06/18/2021. [12148175] [21-35450] (Finer, Jeffry) [Entered: 06/18/2021 02:27 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Lonnie Tofsrud Mediation Questionnaire due on 06/18/2021. Transcript ordered by 07/12/2021. Transcript due 08/10/2021. Appellant Lonnie Tofsrud opening brief due 09/20/2021. Appellees City of Spokane, Justin Lundgren, Craig Meidl and Dave Staben answering brief due 10/20/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12142032] (JBS) [Entered: 06/11/2021 01:52 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
