Marlin Ard v. Oregon State Bar, et al
| MERRY ANN MOORE, COURTNEY CARROLL DIPPEL, OREGON STATE BAR and ROBERT CORRIGAN |
| MARLIN ARD |
| 21-35535 |
| July 1, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: JW): Appellants motion for an extension of time [ # 7 ] to respond to this courts July 28, 2021 order is granted. Appellant shall file a response on or before August 25, 2021. Failure to comply with this order shall result in the automatic dismissal of this appeal by the Clerk for failure to prosecute under Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. Briefing is stayed pending further order of the court. [12208263] (CKP) [Entered: 08/23/2021 09:47 AM] |
| Filing 8 Filed (ECF) Appellant Marlin Ard Motion to extend time to comply with the order dated 07/28/2021. Date of service: 08/19/2021. [12207986] [21-35535] (Ard, Marlin) [Entered: 08/22/2021 11:20 AM] |
| Filing 7 Filed (ECF) Appellant Marlin Ard Motion to extend time to comply with the order dated. Date of service: 08/19/2021. [12206227] [21-35535] (Ard, Marlin) [Entered: 08/19/2021 02:32 PM] |
| Filing 6 Attorneys Amber Hollister and Amber Hollister in 21-35535 substituted by Attorneys Nikhil Thomas Chourey and Nikhil Thomas Chourey in 21-35535 [12187589] (JFF) [Entered: 07/30/2021 09:15 AM] |
| Filing 5 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Nikhil T. Chourey (Oregon State Bar) for Appellees Oregon State Bar and Courtney Carroll Dippel. Substitution for Attorney Ms. Amber Hollister for Appellees Courtney Carroll Dippel and Oregon State Bar. Date of service: 07/30/2021. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12187425] [21-35535] (Chourey, Nikhil) [Entered: 07/30/2021 05:54 AM] |
| Filing 4 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: MF): It appears that the district courts order challenged on appeal may not have disposed of the action as to all claims and all parties. Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellant shall move for voluntary dismissal of this appeal or show cause why it should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Chacon v. Babcock, 640 F.2d 221 (9th Cir. 1981); cf. Schwern v. Plunkett, 845 F.3d 1241, 1242 (9th Cir. 2017) (holding court of appeals has jurisdiction to hear immediate appeals from denials of Oregon anti-SLAPP motions, recognizing that Englert v. MacDonnell, 551 F.3d 1099, 110304 (9th Cir. 2009) was superseded by statute). If appellant elects to show cause, a response may be filed within 10 days after service of the memorandum. If appellant does not comply with this order, the Clerk shall dismiss this appeal pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. Briefing is suspended pending further order of the court. [12185685] (CKP) [Entered: 07/28/2021 01:42 PM] |
| Filing 3 Added Attorney(s) Jonathan Wayne Henderson for party(s) Appellee Robert Corrigan Appellee Merry Ann Moore, in case 21-35535. [12174535] (JFF) [Entered: 07/16/2021 10:56 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Jonathan Henderson (Davis Rothwell Earle & Xochihua PC, 200 SW Market Street, Suite 1800, Portland, OR 97201) for Appellees Robert Corrigan and Merry Ann Moore. Date of service: 07/16/2021. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12174503] [21-35535] (Henderson, Jonathan) [Entered: 07/16/2021 10:36 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Marlin Ard opening brief due 08/30/2021. Appellees Robert Corrigan, Courtney Carroll Dippel, Merry Ann Moore and Oregon State Bar answering brief due 09/29/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12160708] (JBS) [Entered: 07/01/2021 02:51 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
