Jason Failla v. Kilolo Kijakazi
| JASON ROBERT FAILLA |
| ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security and KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security |
| 21-35552 |
| July 9, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: AT): A review of the district court docket reflects that the district court granted appellant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and that such permission has not been revoked. Accordingly, appellants in forma pauperis status continues in this court. See Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(3). Appellants motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal (Docket Entry No. [ # 3 ]) is therefore unnecessary. The previously established briefing schedule remains in effect. [12201157] (OC) [Entered: 08/13/2021 02:08 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Appellant Jason Robert Failla FORM 4 motion and affidavit for permission to proceed in forma pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 07/30/2021. [12191092] (RL) [Entered: 08/03/2021 03:53 PM] |
| Filing 2 Andrew M. Saul substituted by Kilolo Kijakazi effective 07/12/2021. [Created 07/19/2021 by AUTOUPD][12177010]. [21-35552] (CD) [Entered: 07/19/2021 04:37 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Jason Robert Failla opening brief due 09/13/2021. Appellee Andrew M. Saul, Commissioner of Social Security answering brief due 10/13/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12168570] (RT) [Entered: 07/09/2021 03:00 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
