Peter Garcia v. Coast Community Health Center
| PETER GARCIA |
| COAST COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER |
| 21-35555 |
| July 13, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| PETER GARCIA V. COAST COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Filed order MEDIATION (CL): The Mediation Program of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals facilitates settlement while appeals are pending. See Fed. R. App. P. 33 and Ninth Cir. R. 33-1. As part of a pilot project, the Mediation Program is exploring settlement potential in some cases in which one party is proceeding pro se (representing themselves without the assistance of an attorney). This case is being included in the pilot project....All written or spoken communication with the mediator, including the discussions during the scheduled conference, are strictly confidential mediation communications protected by Ninth Circuit Rule 33-1 and cannot be disclosed outside the mediation process. Additional information about confidentiality (including a copy of Ninth Circuit Rule 33-1), the assessment conference, and the Mediation Program are attached and can also be found at the Mediation Program website (www.ca9.uscourts.gov/mediation). The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. (SEE ORDER FOR FULL TEXT) [12205182] (OC) [Entered: 08/18/2021 04:04 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed order MEDIATION (KS): On or before August 17, 2021, counsel for appellee is requested to contact the mediator (kay_suk@ca9.uscourts.gov) to report on the status of the case. Counsel are requested to include the Ninth Circuit case name and number in the subject line. [12201166] (OC) [Entered: 08/13/2021 02:11 PM] |
| Filing 2 Streamlined request by Appellant Peter Garcia to extend time to file the brief is approved. Amended briefing schedule: Appellant Peter Garcia opening brief due 10/01/2021. Appellee Coast Community Health Center answering brief due 11/01/2021. The optional reply brief is due 21 days from the date of service of the answering brief. [12184892] (JN) [Entered: 07/27/2021 05:03 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Peter Garcia opening brief due 09/01/2021. Appellee Coast Community Health Center answering brief due 10/01/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12170609] (JPD) [Entered: 07/13/2021 09:35 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Peter Garcia v. Coast Community Health Center | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: PETER GARCIA | |
| Represented By: | Peter Garcia |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: COAST COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER | |
| Represented By: | Dennis E. Westlind |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
