James Jackson v. R. Nelson, et al
| JAMES D. JACKSON |
| R. NELSON, CO, R. A. YOUNG, Capt., WANONS, Cpl., J. E. DEACON, H.O., L. IVERSON, Retired Capt., A. EYNON, Griev. Diversity Coor., T. STUART, Lt. and S. BOSTON, Capt. |
| 21-35562 |
| July 13, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Filed order MEDIATION (RSK): This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. [12203477] (OC) [Entered: 08/17/2021 10:30 AM] |
| Filing 7 CLERK ORDER FILED (Deputy Clerk CKP) Prisoner completed authorization fee order. [12185597] (CKP) [Entered: 07/28/2021 01:09 PM] |
| Filing 6 Received PLRA authorization response from appellant. Dated 07/22/2021. [Case Number 21-35562: Partially Paid] [12184499] (RL) [Entered: 07/27/2021 02:47 PM] |
| Filing 5 Attorney Shannon M. Vincent substituted by Attorney Denise Gale Fjordbeck. [12177959] (RL) [Entered: 07/20/2021 02:25 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Denise G. Fjordbeck (Oregon Department of Justice - Appellate Division, 1162 Court Street NE, Salem, Oregon 97301) for Appellees S. Boston, J. E. Deacon, A. Eynon, L. Iverson, R. Nelson, T. Stuart, Wanons and R. A. Young. Substitution for Attorney Shannon M. Vincent for Appellees S. Boston, J. E. Deacon, R. Nelson, Wanons and R. A. Young. Date of service: 07/20/2021. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12177943] [21-35562] (Fjordbeck, Denise) [Entered: 07/20/2021 02:20 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed order MEDIATION (RSK): The Mediation Program of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals facilitates settlement while appeals are pending. See Fed. R. App. P. 33 and Ninth Cir. R. 33-1. As part of a pilot project, the Mediation Program is exploring settlement potential in some cases in which one party is proceeding pro se (representing themselves without the assistance of an attorney). This case is being included in the pilot project. By August 9, 2021, the parties are requested to inform the Circuit Mediator in writing whether the issues on appeal or the underlying dispute might be appropriate for settlement discussions. The written response to this order and all future written or spoken communication with the mediator are strictly confidential mediation communications protected by Ninth Circuit Rule 33-1 and cannot be disclosed outside the mediation process. The written response to this order should not be filed with the court; instead, the response should be sent directly to the Circuit Mediator by email (robert_kaiser@ca9.uscourts.gov) or mail (Robert Kaiser, Circuit Mediation Office, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, James R. Browning United States Courthouse, P.O. Box 193939, San Francisco, CA 94119-3939). More detailed information about the Mediation Program and its procedures are included in the attachment to this order and on the Mediation Program web site (www.ca9.uscourts.gov/mediation). The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. (SEE ORDER FOR FULL TEXT) [12176735] (AF) [Entered: 07/19/2021 04:28 PM] |
| Filing 2 CLERK ORDER FILED (Deputy Clerk CKP) Prisoner fee authorization form sent to prisoner. [12175090] (CKP) [Entered: 07/16/2021 03:06 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Transcript ordered by 08/12/2021. Transcript due 09/13/2021. Appellant James D. Jackson opening brief due 10/21/2021. Appellees S. Boston, J. E. Deacon, A. Eynon, L. Iverson, R. Nelson, T. Stuart, Wanons and R. A. Young answering brief due 11/22/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12171663] (JPD) [Entered: 07/13/2021 04:30 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
