Peter Grigg v. Jon Tester
| PETER GRIGG |
| JON TESTER, United States Senator |
| 21-35610 |
| July 30, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Filed Appellant Peter Grigg 2nd motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 09/11/2021. [12234088] (DJV) [Entered: 09/21/2021 07:31 AM] |
| Filing 6 Streamlined request by Appellant Peter Grigg to extend time to file the brief is not approved because it is unnecessary. The briefing schedule is stayed. See 9th Cir. R. 27-11. [12233909] (DLM) [Entered: 09/20/2021 04:44 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed (ECF) Appellee Jon Tester reply to response to order to show cause dated 08/05/2021. Date of service: 08/30/2021. [12214875] [21-35610] (Smith, Mark) [Entered: 08/30/2021 10:24 AM] |
| Filing 4 Filed Appellant Peter Grigg response to order to show cause. Served on 08/14/2021. [12207175] (DJV) [Entered: 08/20/2021 11:46 AM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Appellant Peter Grigg motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 08/05/2021. [12201136] (DJV) [Entered: 08/13/2021 02:01 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: JW): A review of the district courts docket reflects that the district court has certified that this appeal is not taken in good faith and has revoked appellants in forma pauperis status. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a). This court may dismiss a case at any time, if the court determines the case is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days after the date of this order, appellant must: (1) file a motion to dismiss this appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), or (2) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellant also must: (1) file in this court a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, OR (2) pay to the district court $505.00 for the filing and docketing fees for this appeal AND file in this court proof that the $505.00 was paid. If appellant does not respond to this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute, without further notice. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellant files a motion to dismiss the appeal, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). If appellant submits any response to this order other than a motion to dismiss the appeal, the court may dismiss this appeal as frivolous, without further notice. If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellee may file a response within 10 days after service of appellants statement. The briefing schedule for this appeal is stayed. The Clerk shall serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward, and (3) a Form 4 financial affidavit. Appellant may use the enclosed forms for any motion to dismiss the appeal, statement that the appeal should go forward, and/or motion to proceed in forma pauperis. [12193289] (CKP) [Entered: 08/05/2021 02:55 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Peter Grigg opening brief due 09/30/2021. Appellee Jon Tester answering brief due 11/01/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12187959] (RT) [Entered: 07/30/2021 11:47 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Peter Grigg v. Jon Tester | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: PETER GRIGG | |
| Represented By: | Peter Grigg |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: JON TESTER, United States Senator | |
| Represented By: | Victoria L. Francis |
| Represented By: | Mark Steger Smith Esquire |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
