Amy Bonning v. Stephen Bartlett, et al
Petitioner / Appellant: AMY ROSE BONNING
Respondent / Appellee: STEPHEN BARTLETT, Ada County Sheriff, BRAD LITTLE, Governor, STEVEN HIPPLER, Judge and DEPARTMENT OF CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH
Case Number: 21-35611
Filed: July 30, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 20, 2021 Filing 4 Filed order (KIM MCLANE WARDLAW and BRIDGET S. BADE) On June 8, 2021, appellant filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983 which included a challenge to the denial of bail in her state court criminal proceedings. The district court severed the bail challenge for consideration under 28 U.S.C. 2241, but otherwise permitted the 42 U.S.C. 1983 action to proceed. The 1983 action remains pending in the district court. This appeal is only from the district courts dismissal without prejudice of appellants bail challenge as it arose in habeas under 2241. On this narrow issue, the request for a certificate of appealability (Docket Entry No. 3) is denied. See 28 U.S.C. 2253(c)(2); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). Any pending motions are denied as moot. DENIED. [12233050] (WL) [Entered: 09/20/2021 11:52 AM]
August 19, 2021 Filing 3 Filed Appellant Amy Rose Bonning motion Social Emergency for Pandemic Safety. Deficiencies: None. Served on 08/12/2021. [12205873] (DJV) [Entered: 08/19/2021 11:20 AM]
August 19, 2021 Filing 2 Filed Appellant Amy Rose Bonning motion to appoint counsel. Deficiencies: None. Served on 08/12/2021. [12205867] (DJV) [Entered: 08/19/2021 11:18 AM]
July 30, 2021 Filing 1 Open 9th Circuit docket: needs certificate of appealability. Date COA denied in DC: 07/19/2021. Record on appeal included: Yes. [12188085] (RT) [Entered: 07/30/2021 01:08 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Amy Bonning v. Stephen Bartlett, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: AMY ROSE BONNING
Represented By: Amy Rose Bonning
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: STEPHEN BARTLETT, Ada County Sheriff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: BRAD LITTLE, Governor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: STEVEN HIPPLER, Judge
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: DEPARTMENT OF CENTRAL DISTRICT HEALTH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?