Shanna Offutt Evanger v. Georgia-Pacific Gypsum LLC

Plaintiff / Appellant: SHANNA OFFUTT EVANGER
Defendant / Appellee: GEORGIA-PACIFIC GYPSUM LLC
Case Number: 21-35624
Filed: August 3, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
June 6, 2022 SHANNA OFFUTT EVANGER V. GEORGIA-PACIFIC GYPSUM LLC

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 3, 2021 Filing 6 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant settlement discussions while the appeal is pending. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. [12220061] (LW) [Entered: 09/03/2021 12:05 PM]
August 5, 2021 Filing 5 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL IN AssessmentConference, 09/01/2021, 2:30 p.m., PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [12193150] (LW) [Entered: 08/05/2021 01:46 PM]
August 5, 2021 Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Appellant Shanna Offutt Evanger Correspondence: PRAECIPE to change nature of appeal. Date of service: 08/05/2021 [12192914] [21-35624] (Lonnquist, Judith) [Entered: 08/05/2021 11:07 AM]
August 4, 2021 Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 08/04/2021. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12192498]. [21-35624] (AD) [Entered: 08/04/2021 06:44 PM]
August 4, 2021 Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant Shanna Offutt Evanger Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 08/04/2021. [12192324] [21-35624] (Lonnquist, Judith) [Entered: 08/04/2021 04:05 PM]
August 3, 2021 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Shanna Offutt Evanger Mediation Questionnaire due on 08/10/2021. Transcript ordered by 09/02/2021. Transcript due 10/04/2021. Appellant Shanna Offutt Evanger opening brief due 11/12/2021. Appellee Georgia-Pacific Gypsum LLC answering brief due 12/13/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12190853] (RT) [Entered: 08/03/2021 02:07 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Shanna Offutt Evanger v. Georgia-Pacific Gypsum LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: SHANNA OFFUTT EVANGER
Represented By: Judith Alice Lonnquist
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: GEORGIA-PACIFIC GYPSUM LLC
Represented By: Derek A. Bishop Esquire
Represented By: Chad Allan Shultz Esquire
Represented By: Sarah N. Turner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?