Victor Fourstar, Jr. v. David Berkebile, et al
ROBERT SR. MITCHELL |
VICTOR CHARLES FOURSTAR, Jr. |
DAVID BERKEBILE, PETER MOLNAR, ANTHONY PERKINS, PETER BLUDWORTH, UNKNOWN PARTIES, Unknown Nurses, MARY SMITHERENE, TRINA KLOOS, SUSAN CLARK, ROBERT MURTZ, MICHAEL ELIASON and UNKNOWN UNITED STATES PROBATION AND PAROLE OFFICER |
21-35627 |
August 4, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Filed order (Deputy Clerk: MF) The Clerk shall close this appeal as opened in error and file the notice of appeal (District Court Docket No. 18) as an amended notice of appeal from the district courts July 20, 2021 order in appeal No. 21-35629. This order served on the district court shall act as and for the mandate of this court for appeal No. 21-35627. [12208347] (WL) [Entered: 08/23/2021 10:25 AM] |
Filing 3 Received copy of District Court order filed on 08/06/2021. ORDER re [21] REFERRAL NOTICE of USCA. Appeal [19] of Order of June 25, 2019 not frivolous or taken in bad faith [12196218] [21-35627, 21-35629] (RR) [Entered: 08/09/2021 04:15 PM] |
Filing 2 Filed referral notice (Deputy Clerk:CKP): Referring to the district court for determination whether in forma pauperis status should continue for this appeal. [12193205] (CKP) [Entered: 08/05/2021 02:21 PM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES . SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Victor Charles Fourstar Jr. opening brief due 10/01/2021. [12192189] (JPD) [Entered: 08/04/2021 03:18 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.