John Demos, Jr. v. Donald Holbrook, et al
JOHN ROBERT DEMOS, Jr. |
DONALD HOLBROOK, WSP Superintendent, JULIE MARTIN, KECIA L. RONGEN, ROBERT HERZOG, GEORGE A. MARLTON, LYNN CLARK, KAREN FORSS, WILLIAM FRANK JOHN SMITH, MANUEL LOUIS SANTANA, GARY PIERCE, ROCHELLE STEPHENS, STEVE SINCLAIR, JAY ROBERT INSLEE, ROBERT FERGUSON, BETH SHUBACH, JOHN DOE and JANE DOE |
21-35674 |
August 17, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Filed order (MICHAEL DALY HAWKINS, PAUL J. WATFORD and KENNETH K. LEE) The order filed on September 16, 2021 directed the Clerk to serve the order on the Eastern District of California in error. The September 16, 2021 order is vacated, and replaced with this corrected order. This court has reviewed the notice of appeal filed August 10, 2021 in the above-referenced district court docket pursuant to the pre-filing review order entered in docket No. 92-80350. Because the appeal is so insubstantial as to not warrant further review, it shall not be permitted to proceed. See In re Thomas, 508 F.3d 1225 (9th Cir. 2007). Appeal No. 21-35674 is therefore dismissed. All pending motions are denied as moot. This order, served on the district court for the Eastern District of Washington, shall constitute the mandate of this court. No motions for reconsideration, rehearing, clarification, stay of the mandate, or any other submissions shall be filed or entertained. DISMISSED. [12232146] (JMR) [Entered: 09/17/2021 03:21 PM] |
Filing 3 Filed order (MICHAEL DALY HAWKINS, PAUL J. WATFORD and KENNETH K. LEE) This court has reviewed the notice of appeal filed August 10, 2021 in the above-referenced district court docket pursuant to the pre-filing review order entered in docket No. 92-80350. Because the appeal is so insubstantial as to not warrant further review, it shall not be permitted to proceed. See In re Thomas, 508 F.3d 1225 (9th Cir. 2007). Appeal No. 21-35674 is therefore dismissed. All pending motions are denied as moot. This order, served on the district court for the Eastern District of California, shall constitute the mandate of this court. No motions for reconsideration, rehearing, clarification, stay of the mandate, or any other submissions shall be filed or entertained. DISMISSED. [12230838] (JMR) [Entered: 09/16/2021 03:22 PM] |
Filing 2 Filed Appellant John Robert Demos, Jr. motion to supplement and/or amend the notice of appeal. Deficiencies: None. [12217462] (QDL) [Entered: 09/01/2021 09:32 AM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. This appeal is subject to a pre-filing review order in case number 92-80350. The appeal will be reviewed by the Court to determine whether it will be allowed to proceed. No briefing schedule will be set until/unless the Court determines that the appeal should be allowed to proceed. [12203994] (RT) [Entered: 08/17/2021 03:11 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.