USA v. Carol Engen, et al
Defendant: KING COUNTY and QUALSTAR CREDIT UNION
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: CAROL L. ENGEN
Case Number: 21-35804
Filed: September 24, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
March 17, 2023 USA V. CAROL ENGEN, ET AL

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 19, 2021 Filing 6 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: AT): The court has received appellants emergency motion, filed November 18, 2021. Any response to the motion is due by 9:00 a.m. PST on November 23, 2021. An optional reply may be filed by 9:00 a.m. PST on November 24, 2021. [12293505] (AF) [Entered: 11/19/2021 01:52 PM]
November 19, 2021 Filing 5 Filed (ECF) Appellant Mrs. Carol L. Engen EMERGENCY Motion to stay lower court action. Date of service: 11/19/2021. [12293149] [21-35804] (Engen, Carol) [Entered: 11/19/2021 11:25 AM]
November 18, 2021 Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Appellant Mrs. Carol L. Engen EMERGENCY Motion to stay lower court action. Date of service: 11/18/2021. [12292484] [21-35804] (Engen, Carol) [Entered: 11/18/2021 04:26 PM]
September 30, 2021 Filing 3 Added Attorney(s) Carl D. Wasserman for party(s) Appellee USA, in case 21-35804. [12243420] (DJV) [Entered: 09/30/2021 07:42 AM]
September 30, 2021 Filing 2 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Carl D. Wasserman (U.S. Department of Justice, Tax Division, Appellate Section, Post Office Box 502, Washington, D.C. 20044) for Appellee USA. Date of service: 09/30/2021. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12243411] [21-35804] (Wasserman, Carl) [Entered: 09/30/2021 07:33 AM]
September 24, 2021 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Carol L. Engen opening brief due 11/24/2021. Appellee United States of America answering brief due 12/27/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12238302] (RT) [Entered: 09/24/2021 12:13 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: USA v. Carol Engen, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Joan I. Oppenheimer
Represented By: Carl D. Wasserman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: KING COUNTY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: QUALSTAR CREDIT UNION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: CAROL L. ENGEN
Represented By: Carol L. Engen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?