Raymond Devore v. BOP, et al
| RAYMOND EARL DEVORE |
| FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and SELECT OFFICIALS |
| 21-35820 |
| September 30, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Filed order (M. MARGARET MCKEOWN, WILLIAM A. FLETCHER and JAY S. BYBEE): A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the orders challenged in the appeal are not final or appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; In re San Vicente Med. Partners Ltd., 865 F.2d 1128, 1131 (9th Cir. 1989) (order) (magistrate judge order not final or appealable); Wilborn v. Escalderon, 789 F.2d 1328, 1330 (9th Cir. 1986) (denial of appointment of counsel in civil case is not appealable); see also Branson v. City of Los Angeles, 912 F.2d 334 (9th Cir. 1990) (denial of reconsideration of non-appealable order is itself not appealable). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. All pending motions are denied as moot. DISMISSED. [12259780] (AF) [Entered: 10/18/2021 11:34 AM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Appellant Raymond Earl Devore letter dated 10/04/2021 re: verification appeal will continue IFP.. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12254736] (RR) [Entered: 10/12/2021 04:52 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed Appellant Raymond Earl Devore motion to appoint pro bono counsel. Deficiencies: None. [12254730] (RR) [Entered: 10/12/2021 04:50 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Raymond Earl Devore opening brief due 11/29/2021. [12243529] (JPD) [Entered: 09/30/2021 09:37 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
