Byron Case v. Douglas County Oregon, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: BYRON CASE, and as Dependents
Defendant / Appellee: DOUGLAS COUNTY OREGON, FRANCES BURGE, Circuit Court, ANNE MARIE SIMMONS, Circuit Court, DOUGLAS COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE and JOHN HANLIN, Sheriff
Case Number: 21-35851
Filed: October 8, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 6, 2021 Filing 18 Filed Appellant Byron Case letter dated 11/26/2021 re: Additional statements in support of case. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12306977] (RL) [Entered: 12/06/2021 02:07 PM]
December 6, 2021 Filing 17 Filed Appellant Byron Case urgent request to consider order to stay pending appeal (document formatted as letter). Deficiencies: None. Served on 11/27/2021. [12306669] (RL) [Entered: 12/06/2021 12:18 PM]
November 22, 2021 Filing 16 Filed Appellant Byron Case FORM 24 motion for appointment of counsel. Deficiencies: None. Served on 11/18/2021. [12295561] (RL) [Entered: 11/22/2021 03:03 PM]
November 22, 2021 Filing 15 Filed Appellant Byron Case FORM 27 motion for temporary injunction. Deficiencies: None. Served on 11/18/2021. [12295555] (RL) [Entered: 11/22/2021 03:02 PM]
November 10, 2021 Filing 14 Filed (ECF) Appellees Douglas County Oregon, Douglas County Sheriff's Office and John Hanlin response to Court order dated 10/20/2021. Date of service: 11/10/2021. [12283689] [21-35851] (Meyer, Paul) [Entered: 11/10/2021 08:23 AM]
November 8, 2021 Filing 13 Filed Appellant Byron Case statement that appeal should go forward. Served on 11/02/2021. [12281451] (RL) [Entered: 11/08/2021 02:25 PM]
October 20, 2021 Filing 12 Filed order (M. MARGARET MCKEOWN and WILLIAM A. FLETCHER) Appellants emergency motions for injunctive relief (Docket Entry Nos. [ # 4 ] and [ # 9 ]) are denied. A review of the district courts docket reflects that the district court has certified that this appeal is not taken in good faith and has revoked appellants in forma pauperis status. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a). This court may dismiss a case at any time, if the court determines the case is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days after the date of this order, appellant must: (1) file a motion to dismiss this appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), OR (2) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. If appellant does not respond to this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute, without further notice. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellant files a motion to dismiss the appeal, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). If appellant submits any response to this order other than a motion to dismiss the appeal, the court may dismiss this appeal as frivolous, without further notice. If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellees may file a response within 10 days after service of appellants statement. The briefing schedule for this appeal is stayed. The Clerk shall serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal and (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward. Appellant may use the enclosed forms for any motion to dismiss the appeal or statement that the appeal should go forward. [12263436] (OC) [Entered: 10/20/2021 03:11 PM]
October 19, 2021 Filing 11 Filed Appellant Byron Case FORM 25 certificate of service for paper filing. Dated 10/13/2021. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12262776] (RL) [Entered: 10/20/2021 11:11 AM]
October 15, 2021 Filing 7 Added Attorney(s) Paul Meyer for party(s) Appellee Douglas County Oregon, Appellee Douglas County Sheriff's Office and Appellee John Hanlin, in case 21-35851. [12258259] (QDL) [Entered: 10/15/2021 10:26 AM]
October 15, 2021 Filing 6 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Paul E. Meyer (Douglas County Counsel 1036 SE Douglas Ave. Rm 321 Roseburg, OR 97470) for Appellees Douglas County Sheriff's Office, John Hanlin and Douglas County Oregon. Date of service: 10/15/2021. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12258208] [21-35851] (Meyer, Paul) [Entered: 10/15/2021 10:05 AM]
October 14, 2021 Filing 5 Received copy of District Court order filed on 10/13/2021 Motion to proceed in forma pauperis denied. [12256607] (DJV) [Entered: 10/14/2021 09:27 AM]
October 12, 2021 Filing 4 Filed Appellant Byron L. Case FORM 16 Circuit Rule 27-3 certificate for emergency motion, request for injunction. Deficiencies: None. Served on 10/12/2021. [12254463] (RL) [Entered: 10/12/2021 03:22 PM]
October 12, 2021 Filing 3 Filed referral notice (Deputy Clerk:CKP): Referring to the district court for determination whether in forma pauperis status should continue for this appeal. [12254266] (CKP) [Entered: 10/12/2021 02:24 PM]
October 8, 2021 Filing 9 Filed Appellant Byron Case FORM 16 Circuit Rule 27-3 certificate for emergency motion, request for injunction. Deficiencies: None. Served on 10/05/2021. [12258761] (QDL) [Entered: 10/15/2021 02:40 PM]
October 8, 2021 Filing 8 Deleted Incorrect Entry. Entered in error. [12258736] (QDL) [Entered: 10/15/2021 02:32 PM]
October 8, 2021 Filing 2 Filed Appellant Byron L. Case motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 10/07/2021. [12251846] (JPD) [Entered: 10/08/2021 09:59 AM]
October 8, 2021 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Byron L. Case opening brief due 12/06/2021. [12251839] (JPD) [Entered: 10/08/2021 09:55 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Byron Case v. Douglas County Oregon, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: BYRON CASE, and as Dependents
Represented By: Byron Case
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: DOUGLAS COUNTY OREGON
Represented By: Paul Meyer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: FRANCES BURGE, Circuit Court
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: ANNE MARIE SIMMONS, Circuit Court
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: DOUGLAS COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
Represented By: Paul Meyer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: JOHN HANLIN, Sheriff
Represented By: Paul Meyer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?