Christopher Gates v. King County Correctional, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: CHRISTOPHER M. GATES
Defendant / Appellee: KING COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, DEPARTMENT OF ADULT AND JUVENILE DETENTION, PASCAL HERZER, Civil Prosecutor, KING COUNTY, GREGG CURTIS, Corrections Program Administrator, King County Jail, DEBORAH OGLE, Inmate Management and Services, King County Jail and J. KANG, Inmate Management and Services, King County Jail
Case Number: 21-35875
Filed: October 18, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 16, 2021 Filing 6 MANDATE ISSUED. (SSI, JBO and MJB) [12317687] (RR) [Entered: 12/16/2021 10:07 AM]
December 8, 2021 Filing 5 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: DA): This appeal was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction on November 9, 2021. Appellants request for a stay of proceedings in this court, received November 26, 2021, is denied (Docket Entry No. [ # 3 ]). This appeal No. 21-35875 remains closed. A review of the district court docket reflects that the district court action No. 2:19-cv-01185-JCC-MLP remains pending. [12310536] (JBS) [Entered: 12/08/2021 03:42 PM]
December 1, 2021 Filing 4 Mail returned on 11/30/2021 addressed to Christopher M. Gates, re: [ # 2 ] Dispositive Order. Returned envelope notes: return to sender, not here. Resending to: #360360, WCC - WASHINGTON CORRECTIONS CENTER (SHELTON), P.O. Box 900, Shelton, WA 98584. [12303075] --[Edited: Updated Address. 12/01/2021 by TYL] (LA) [Entered: 12/01/2021 04:05 PM]
November 26, 2021 Filing 3 Filed Appellant Christopher M. Gates letter dated 11/12/2021 re: request no action be taken due to lack of unavailabitity. Paper filing deficiency: Case closed. [12300626] (RR) [Entered: 11/29/2021 08:17 PM]
November 9, 2021 Filing 2 Filed order (SANDRA S. IKUTA, JOHN B. OWENS and MARK J. BENNETT) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the September 8, 2021 order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291. Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. DISMISSED. [12282281] (JMR) [Entered: 11/09/2021 09:28 AM]
October 18, 2021 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Christopher M. Gates opening brief due 12/13/2021. Appellees Gregg Curtis, Department of Adult and Juvenile Detention, Pascal Herzer, J. Kang, King County, King County Correctional Facility and Deborah Ogle answering brief due 01/11/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12260097] (JMR) [Entered: 10/18/2021 02:05 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Christopher Gates v. King County Correctional, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: CHRISTOPHER M. GATES
Represented By: Christopher M. Gates
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: KING COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: DEPARTMENT OF ADULT AND JUVENILE DETENTION
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: PASCAL HERZER, Civil Prosecutor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: KING COUNTY
Represented By: Raam D. Wong
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: GREGG CURTIS, Corrections Program Administrator, King County Jail
Represented By: Raam D. Wong
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: DEBORAH OGLE, Inmate Management and Services, King County Jail
Represented By: Raam D. Wong
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: J. KANG, Inmate Management and Services, King County Jail
Represented By: Raam D. Wong
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?