Eric Johnson v. State of Idaho, et al
ERIC SWAIN JOHNSON |
STATE OF IDAHO, IDAHO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, KEITH YORDY, Warden, DARRYL BLANCHARD, WARDEN, Valley Custody and DOES, 1-10 |
21-35961 |
November 18, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
ERIC JOHNSON V. STATE OF IDAHO, ET AL |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 CLERK ORDER FILED (Deputy Clerk CKP) Prisoner completed authorization fee order. [12330550] (CKP) [Entered: 01/04/2022 11:21 AM] |
Filing 6 Received PLRA authorization response from appellant. Dated 12/22/2021. [12330229] (JFF) [Entered: 01/04/2022 09:01 AM] |
Filing 8 Received notice of change of address dated from Eric Swain Johnson. New address: South Idaho Correctional Institution P.O.Box 8509 BoiseIdaho 83707. [12330693] --[Edited: Updated Address. 01/04/2022 by TYL] (JFF) [Entered: 01/04/2022 12:25 PM] |
Filing 5 Filed original and 7 copies of Appellant Eric Swain Johnson opening brief of 11 pages (Informal: Yes). Served on 12/22/2021. [12328124] (LA) [Entered: 12/30/2021 03:26 PM] |
Filing 4 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: DA): A review of the district court docket reflects that appellant was permitted to proceed in forma pauperis in the district court, and that such permission has not been revoked to date. Consequently, appellants forma pauperis status continues in this court. Fed. R. App. P. 24(a). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1) and (2), however, appellant must pay the full amount of the filing and docketing fees for this appeal when funds are available in appellants account. Consequently, within 21 days after the filing date of this order, appellant shall complete and file with this court the enclosed authorization form, which directs the prison officials at appellants institution to assess, collect, and forward to the court the $505.00 filing and docketing fees for this appeal on a monthly basis whenever funds exist in appellants trust fund account. These fees will continue to be collected regardless of the date or manner of disposition of this appeal. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(2) and (e)(2). Appellant is not responsible for payment when the funds in appellants prison trust account total less than $10, but payments must resume when additional deposits are made or funds are otherwise available. Appellants motion for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted in part [ # 3 ]. The opening brief is due March 14, 2022. Because there is no appearance by appellees, briefing will be completed upon the filing of the opening brief. Because appellant is proceeding without counsel, appellant is not required to file excerpts of record. See 9th Cir. R. 30-1.3. If appellant fails to comply with this order, the appeal may be dismissed by the Clerk. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. The Clerk will serve this order and a prison authorization form on appellant. [12314235] (CKP) [Entered: 12/13/2021 01:51 PM] |
Filing 3 Filed Appellant Eric Swain Johnson motion to extend time to file appellant opening brief until 05/02/2022. Deficiencies: None. Served on 11/24/2021. [12312969] (QDL) [Entered: 12/10/2021 02:59 PM] |
Filing 2 Filed referral notice (Deputy Clerk:CKP): Referring to the district court for determination whether in forma pauperis status should continue for this appeal. [12292173] (CKP) [Entered: 11/18/2021 02:55 PM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Eric Swain Johnson opening brief due 01/20/2022. [12291785] (RT) [Entered: 11/18/2021 12:33 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.