Brian Johnson v. Pritz Navaratnasingam, et al
| BRIAN K. JOHNSON |
| PRITZ NAVARATNASINGAM, Director V.A. Regional Office, MIKE KWAITER, Claim Adjustor, MICHAEL TEDYCH, Director of V.A. Hospital, DOCTOR VANDERWALKER and DOCTOR PSYCHOLOGIST BROWN |
| 21-35968 |
| November 23, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| BRIAN JOHNSON V. PRITZ NAVARATNASINGAM |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Filed Appellant Brian K. Johnson writ of mandamus to chief judge. Dated 01/07/2022. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12334933] (RL) [Entered: 01/07/2022 04:40 PM] |
| Filing 4 Sent document. Docket entries [ # 1 ] and [ # 2 ] were re-sent via U.S.Mail to updated address: 23502 16th Avenue, S. H 106, Des Moines, WA 98198 [12334892] (OC) [Entered: 01/07/2022 04:13 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Appellant Brian K. Johnson letter dated 11/19/2021 re: Notice of appeal, request for change of venue. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12297268] (QDL) [Entered: 11/23/2021 05:38 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed referral notice (Deputy Clerk:CKP): Referring to the district court for determination whether in forma pauperis status should continue for this appeal. [12296809] (CKP) [Entered: 11/23/2021 01:25 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Brian K. Johnson opening brief due 01/18/2022. [12296396] (JMR) [Entered: 11/23/2021 10:01 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
