Cyrus Plush v. Jeffrey Uttecht, et al
| STATE OF WASHINGTON |
| CYRUS N. PLUSH |
| JEFFREY A. UTTECHT, Warden |
| 21-35972 |
| November 23, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Received original and 0 copies of Appellant Cyrus N. Plush opening brief of 5 pages (Informal: Yes). Served on 12/29/2021. Served by Court via CM/ECF. Major deficiency: no briefing schedule, no certificate of service on appellee's counsel. Notified Appellant. [12326895] (KWG) [Entered: 12/29/2021 10:16 AM] |
| Filing 4 Mail returned on 12/20/2021 addressed to Cyrus N. Plush, re: [ # 1 ] Certificate of appealability Case Opening Document. Returned envelope notes: Return to sender, offender missed call out 2x 12/13, 12/14. Resending to: case files; inmate refuses mail [12322084] (JBS) [Entered: 12/21/2021 02:32 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Appellant Cyrus N. Plush letter dated 11/30/2021 re: Appeal of dismissal of case. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12314631] (QDL) [Entered: 12/13/2021 04:20 PM] |
| Filing 2 Mail returned on 12/07/2021 addressed to Cyrus N. Plush, re: [ # 1 ] Certificate of appealability Case Opening Document. Returned envelope notes: Return to sender, "offender no show 2 attempts to deliver". Resending to: same address - CRCC - COYOTE RIDGE CORRECTIONS CENTER P.O. Box 769 Connell, WA 99326 [12311837] (JBS) [Entered: 12/09/2021 03:25 PM] |
| Filing 1 Open 9th Circuit docket: needs certificate of appealability. Date COA denied in DC: 09/17/2021. Record on appeal included: Yes. [12297045] (WL) [Entered: 11/23/2021 03:27 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
