Sanchez Argueta v. Garland
| DANIEL ALFONSO SANCHEZ ARGUETA |
| MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 21-439 |
| July 22, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 19
ORDER FILED. Respondent's unopposed motion to remand this matter to the Board of Immigration Appeals (Docket Entry No. 18) is granted. Petitioners removal is stayed pending a Board decision in this matter. As stated in the unopposed motion, the parties shall bear their own fees and costs. This order served on the agency shall act as the mandate of this court. REMANDED. [Entered: 04/05/2022 01:26:00 PM]
|
| Filing 18 MOTION to remand case filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 03/11/2022 06:12:00 AM] |
|
Filing 17
ORDER FILED. Motion to Extend Time to File Answering Brief (DE 16) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Respondent Answering Brief due 3/28/2022. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 12/27/2021 02:50:00 PM]
|
| Filing 16 MOTION to extend time to file answering brief filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 12/17/2021 05:21:00 AM] |
| Filing 15 Paper copies (6) of Opening Brief submitted at DE 13 by Petitioner Daniel Alfonso Sanchez Argueta received. [Entered: 10/15/2021 05:39:00 PM] |
| Filing 14 CLERK ORDER. Opening Brief submitted at DE 13 by Petitioner Daniel Alfonso Sanchez Argueta is filed. Within 7 days of this order, petitioner must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with blue front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 10/07/2021 11:45:00 AM] |
| Filing 13 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Petitioner Daniel Alfonso Sanchez Argueta. [Entered: 10/07/2021 10:23:00 AM]--[COURT UPDATE: Attached addendum] [Edited: 10/07/2021 11:40:00 AM] |
|
Filing 12
ORDER FILED Motion to Stay Removal (DE 1) not opposed. [Entered: 09/14/2021 01:06:00 PM]
|
| Filing 11 STATEMENT OF NON-OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 09/14/2021 06:44:00 AM] |
| Filing 10 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed. [Entered: 08/06/2021 06:14:00 AM] |
|
Filing 9
ORDER FILED Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis or Form 4 (DE 4) granted. [Entered: 07/30/2021 02:12:00 PM] Resent notice to include document link. [Edited: 09/03/2021 05:31:00 PM]
|
| Filing 8 ADDED Lynda Do for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 07/23/2021 09:12:00 AM] |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Lynda Do for Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 07/23/2021 07:29:00 AM] |
| Filing 6 BRIEFING SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due 8/26/2021, Respondent Response to Stay Motion (Filed with PFR) due 9/16/2021, Petitioner Opening Brief due 10/25/2021, Respondent Answering Brief due 12/25/2021. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 07/22/2021 04:04:00 PM] |
| Filing 5 CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 7/22/2021. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 21-439 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 07/22/2021 04:00:00 PM] |
| Filing 4 MOTION to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 07/22/2021 03:54:00 PM] |
| Filing 3 AGENCY DECISION on review dated 6/24/2021. [Entered: 07/22/2021 03:54:00 PM] |
| Filing 2 PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 07/22/2021 03:53:00 PM] |
| Filing 1 MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner(s); REMOVAL STAYED pending further order of the court per General Order 6.4(c). [Entered: 07/22/2021 03:50:00 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Sanchez Argueta v. Garland | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: DANIEL ALFONSO SANCHEZ ARGUETA | |
| Represented By: | David Bagdasarian |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL | |
| Represented By: | Lynda Do |
| Represented By: | OIL |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
