Diaz-Ocampo v. Garland
| JOSE LUIS DIAZ-OCAMPO |
| MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 21-511 |
| August 5, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER FILED. Dismissal for failure to file opening brief. [Entered: 12/10/2021 05:11:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER FILED Motion to Stay Removal (DE 2) not opposed. [Entered: 09/13/2021 02:35:00 PM]
|
| Filing 9 STATEMENT OF NON-OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 09/10/2021 02:01:00 PM] |
| Filing 8 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed. [Entered: 08/26/2021 08:13:00 PM] |
| Filing 7 ADDED Jane Tracey Schaffner for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 08/06/2021 09:46:00 AM] |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Jane Tracey Schaffner for Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 08/06/2021 07:28:00 AM] |
| Filing 5 BRIEFING SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due 9/9/2021, Respondent Response to Stay Motion (Filed with PFR) due 9/30/2021, Petitioner Opening Brief due 11/8/2021, Respondent Answering Brief due 1/7/2022. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 08/05/2021 02:45:00 PM] |
| Filing 4 CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 8/5/2021. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 21-511 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 08/05/2021 02:12:00 PM] |
| Filing 3 AGENCY DECISION on review dated 7/8/2021. [Entered: 08/05/2021 01:22:00 PM] |
| Filing 2 MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner(s); REMOVAL STAYED pending further order of the court per General Order 6.4(c). [Entered: 08/05/2021 01:21:00 PM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 08/05/2021 01:20:00 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Diaz-Ocampo v. Garland | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: JOSE LUIS DIAZ-OCAMPO | |
| Represented By: | Sergio Siderman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL | |
| Represented By: | OIL |
| Represented By: | Jane Tracey Schaffner |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
