Yehonatan Kapach v. Intel Corporation, et al
Defendant / Appellee: GEORGE KARA, INTEL CORPORATION, YAEL VILNER, ESTHER HAUT, ANAT BARON, DAPHNA BARAK EREZ, YEHORAM SHAKED, DAVID MINTZ, DIKLA KLEIN YONA and EDNA ARBEL
Plaintiff / Appellant: YEHONATAN KAPACH
Case Number: 21-55000
Filed: January 4, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 26, 2021 Filing 10 Filed (ECF) Appellant Mr. Yehonatan Kapach Motion to extend time to file Opening brief. Date of service: 02/26/2021. [12019168] --[COURT ENTERED FILING to correct entry [5] .] (TYL) [Entered: 03/01/2021 08:43 AM]
February 26, 2021 Filing 9 Streamlined request [6] by Appellant Mr. Yehonatan Kapach to extend time to file the brief is not approved because it is unnecessary. The briefing schedule is stayed per clerk order filed 02/25/2021. Docket [4]. [12017636] (DLM) [Entered: 02/26/2021 09:35 AM]
February 26, 2021 Filing 8 Filed (ECF) Appellant Mr. Yehonatan Kapach Motion for miscellaneous relief [Pay court fee in installments if fee exemption not granted]. Date of service: 02/26/2021. [12017420] [21-55000] (Kapach, Yehonatan) [Entered: 02/26/2021 05:59 AM]
February 26, 2021 Filing 7 Filed (ECF) Appellant Mr. Yehonatan Kapach Motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Date of service: 02/26/2021. [12017418] [21-55000]--[COURT UPDATE: Updated docket text to reflect content of filing. 02/26/2021 by SLM] (Kapach, Yehonatan) [Entered: 02/26/2021 05:51 AM]
February 26, 2021 Filing 6 Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Opening Brief by Appellant Mr. Yehonatan Kapach. New requested due date is 04/01/2021. [12017417] [21-55000] (Kapach, Yehonatan) [Entered: 02/26/2021 05:40 AM]
February 26, 2021 Filing 5 COURT DELETED INCORRECT ENTRY. Notice about deletion sent to case participants registered for electronic filing. Correct Entry: [ # 10 ]. Original Text: Filed (ECF) Appellant Mr. Yehonatan Kapach Correspondence: Stipulation to modify calendaring of the appeal. Date of service: 02/26/2021 [12017416] [21-55000] (Kapach, Yehonatan) [Entered: 02/26/2021 05:34 AM]
February 25, 2021 Filing 4 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CO): A review of the district courts docket reflects that the district court has certified that this appeal is not taken in good faith and is frivolous and has revoked appellants in forma pauperis status. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a). This court may dismiss a case at any time, if the court determines the case is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days after the date of this order, appellant must: (1) file a motion to dismiss this appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), or (2) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellant also must: (1) file in this court a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, OR (2) pay to the district court $505.00 for the filing and docketing fees for this appeal AND file in this court proof that the $505.00 was paid. If appellant does not respond to this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute, without further notice. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellant files a motion to dismiss the appeal, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). If appellant submits any response to this order other than a motion to dismiss the appeal, the court may dismiss this appeal as frivolous, without further notice. If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellees may file a response within 10 days after service of appellants statement. The briefing schedule for this appeal is stayed. The Clerk shall serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward, and (3) a Form 4 financial affidavit. Appellant may use the enclosed forms for any motion to dismiss the appeal, statement that the appeal should go forward, and/or motion to proceed in forma pauperis. [12016814] (CKP) [Entered: 02/25/2021 01:03 PM]
January 19, 2021 Filing 3 Filed referral notice (Deputy Clerk:CKP): Referring to the district court for determination whether in forma pauperis status should continue for this appeal. [11968425] (CKP) [Entered: 01/19/2021 03:39 PM]
January 6, 2021 Filing 2 Received Appellant Yehonatan Kapach notice regarding DC documents. [11955953] (RR) [Entered: 01/07/2021 02:17 PM]
January 4, 2021 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Yehonatan Kapach opening brief due 03/01/2021. Appellee Intel Corporation answering brief due 03/30/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [COURT UPDATE: corrected docketing letter to include briefing schedule for answering brief--resent NDA] [11950549] --[Edited: Attached corrected docketing letter (backdated to 1/4/21). 01/14/2021 by TYL] (JPD) [Entered: 01/04/2021 09:48 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Yehonatan Kapach v. Intel Corporation, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: GEORGE KARA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: INTEL CORPORATION
Represented By: Scott P. Jang Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: YAEL VILNER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: ESTHER HAUT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: ANAT BARON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: DAPHNA BARAK EREZ
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: YEHORAM SHAKED
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: DAVID MINTZ
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: DIKLA KLEIN YONA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: EDNA ARBEL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: YEHONATAN KAPACH
Represented By: Yehonatan Kapach
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?