Joshua Zamora Gonzales v. City of Colton, et al
| DOES, Doe Supervisor for City of Colton; 1-10, inclusive and ESTATE OF DETECTIVE JACK MORENBERG |
| MICHAEL COLLINS, Colton Police Officer and CITY OF COLTON |
| JOSHUA ZAMORA GONZALES |
| 21-55004 |
| January 5, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN AssessmentConference, 03/17/2021, 10:00 a.m., PACIFIC Time. See order for instructions and details. [12024578] (VS) [Entered: 03/04/2021 02:00 PM] |
| Filing 13 Filed (ECF) Appellee Joshua Zamora Gonzales reply to response to order to show cause dated 01/26/2021. Date of service: 02/26/2021. [12017997] [21-55004] (McLane, David) [Entered: 02/26/2021 12:34 PM] |
| Filing 12 Added Attorney(s) Jarrett Adams for party(s) Appellee Joshua Zamora Gonzales, in case 21-55004. [12014029] (DJV) [Entered: 02/23/2021 02:56 PM] |
| Filing 11 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of JARRETT ADAMS (Law Offices of Jarrett Adams, PLLC) for Appellee Joshua Zamora Gonzales. Date of service: 02/23/2021. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12014005] [21-55004] (Adams, Jarrett) [Entered: 02/23/2021 02:48 PM] |
| Filing 10 Filed (ECF) Appellants City of Colton and Michael Collins response to order to show cause dated 01/26/2021. Date of service: 02/16/2021. [12005447] [21-55004] (Parnell, Laraya) [Entered: 02/16/2021 05:17 PM] |
| Filing 9 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 02/11/2021. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12001525]. [21-55004] (AD) [Entered: 02/11/2021 06:44 PM] |
| Filing 8 Filed (ECF) Appellee Joshua Zamora Gonzales Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 02/11/2021. [12001518] [21-55004] (McLane, David) [Entered: 02/11/2021 06:23 PM] |
| Filing 7 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: LCC): A review of the record suggests that this court may lack jurisdiction over the appeal filed by the City of Colton because the order challenged in the appeal may not be final or appealable as to the City. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Monell v. Dept of Soc. Servs., 436 U.S. 658, 701 (1978) (municipal bodies sued under 42 U.S.C. 1983 are not entitled to absolute immunity). Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellant City of Colton shall move for voluntary dismissal of its appeal or show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed as to the City for lack of jurisdiction. If the City of Colton elects to show cause, a response may be filed within 10 days after service of the memorandum. If the City of Colton does not comply with this order, the Clerk shall dismiss the appeal as to the City pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. Briefing is suspended pending further order of the court. [11982031] (AF) [Entered: 01/26/2021 02:34 PM] |
| Filing 6 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: By 02/01/2021, counsel to email Circuit Mediator regarding settlement potential. Include Ninth Circuit case number in subject line. This communication will be kept confidential, if requested, and should not be filed with the court. The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. [11967545] (VS) [Entered: 01/19/2021 11:03 AM] |
| Filing 5 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 01/12/2021. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11961586]. [21-55004] (AD) [Entered: 01/12/2021 06:44 PM] |
| Filing 4 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 01/12/2021. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11961585]. [21-55004] (AD) [Entered: 01/12/2021 06:44 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Appellants City of Colton and Michael Collins Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 01/12/2021. [11961529] [21-55004] (Parnell, Laraya) [Entered: 01/12/2021 05:12 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellants City of Colton and Michael Collins Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 01/12/2021. [11961425] [21-55004] (Parnell, Laraya) [Entered: 01/12/2021 04:31 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellants City of Colton and Michael Collins Mediation Questionnaire due on 01/12/2021. Appellants City of Colton and Michael Collins opening brief due 03/01/2021. Appellee Joshua Zamora Gonzales answering brief due 03/31/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11952271] (JBS) [Entered: 01/05/2021 09:11 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
