Susan Porter v. William Gore, et al
| WARREN STANLEY |
| AMANDA RAY, as successor to Warren Stanley, in her official capacity as Commissioner of California Highway Patrol and WILLIAM D. GORE, in his official capacity as Sheriff of San Diego County |
| SUSAN PORTER |
| 21-55149 |
| February 23, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 SUSAN PORTER V. KELLY MARTINEZ, ET AL
|
|
SUSAN PORTER V. KELLY MARTINEZ, ET AL
|
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Conference w/ counsel for appellant only, 04/19/2021, 10:00 a.m. Pacific Time. See order for details. [12070016] (CL) [Entered: 04/09/2021 05:08 PM] |
| Filing 11 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Conference w/ counsel for appellee only, 03/30/2021, 10:00 a.m. Pacific Time. See order for details. [12056681] (CL) [Entered: 03/29/2021 01:45 PM] |
| Filing 10 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 03/24/2021, 10:00 a.m. PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [12040247] (CL) [Entered: 03/12/2021 08:00 PM] |
| Filing 9 Attorney David William Loy in 21-55149 substituted by Attorney John David Loy in 21-55149 [12023827] (JPD) [Entered: 03/04/2021 08:44 AM] |
| Filing 8 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 03/02/2021. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12022228]. [21-55149] (AD) [Entered: 03/02/2021 06:44 PM] |
| Filing 7 Filed (ECF) Appellant Susan Porter Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 03/02/2021. [12022002] [21-55149] (Waxman, Jay) [Entered: 03/02/2021 03:51 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of J. Mark Waxman (Foley & Lardner LLP, 11988 El Camino Real, Suite 400, San Diego, CA 92130) for Appellant Susan Porter. Date of service: 03/02/2021. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12021830] [21-55149] (Waxman, Jay) [Entered: 03/02/2021 02:31 PM] |
| Filing 6 Added Attorney(s) Jay Waxman for party(s) Appellant Susan Porter, in case 21-55149. [12021911] (JFF) [Entered: 03/02/2021 03:08 PM] |
| Filing 4 Added Attorney(s) Jeffrey P. Michalowski for party(s) Appellee William D. Gore, in case 21-55149. [12014867] (JFF) [Entered: 02/24/2021 10:22 AM] |
| Filing 3 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Jeffrey P. Michalowski (Office of County Counsel, 1600 Pacific Highway, Room 355, San Diego, CA 92101) for Appellee William D. Gore. Date of service: 02/24/2021. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12014826] [21-55149] (Michalowski, Jeffrey) [Entered: 02/24/2021 10:07 AM] |
| Filing 2 Entered appearance of Court Reporter Chari Bowery in this case. [12013940] (JPD) [Entered: 02/23/2021 02:28 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Susan Porter Mediation Questionnaire due on 03/02/2021. Transcript ordered by 03/25/2021. Transcript due 04/26/2021. Appellant Susan Porter opening brief due 06/03/2021. Appellees William D. Gore and Amanda Ray answering brief due 07/06/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12013842] (JPD) [Entered: 02/23/2021 01:57 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
