Calvin Sharp, Jr. v. Stuart Sherman
| CALVIN LEONARD SHARP, Jr. |
| STUART SHERMAN, Warden |
| 21-55167 |
| February 25, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Filed order (MORGAN B. CHRISTEN and PAUL J. WATFORD) The request for a certificate of appealability is denied because the notice of appeal was not timely filed. See 28 U.S.C. 2107, 2253(c)(2). Any pending motions are denied as moot. DENIED. [12055053] (RY) [Entered: 03/26/2021 02:47 PM] |
| Filing 1 Open 9th Circuit docket: needs certificate of appealability. Date COA denied in DC: 11/05/2020. Record on appeal included: Yes. [12017194] (WL) [Entered: 02/25/2021 03:58 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Calvin Sharp, Jr. v. Stuart Sherman | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: CALVIN LEONARD SHARP, Jr. | |
| Represented By: | Calvin Leonard Sharp Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: STUART SHERMAN, Warden | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.