Tomer Graziani, et al v. Matthew Whitaker, et al
| IRENE MARTIN, MATTHEW G. WHITAKER, Acting Attorney General, KIRSTJEN NIELSEN and L. FRANCIS CISSNA |
| RACHAEL KATHERINE WILMOTH, AKA Rachael Katherine Eicher-Graziani and TOMER GRAZIANI |
| 21-55190 |
| March 3, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| TOMER GRAZIANI V. MATTHEW WHITAKER |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Streamlined request [7] by Appellants Tomer Graziani and Rachael Katherine Wilmoth to extend time to file the brief is approved. Amended briefing schedule: Appellants Tomer Graziani and Rachael Katherine Wilmoth opening brief due 06/04/2021. Appellees L. Francis Cissna, Irene Martin, Kirstjen Nielsen and Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting Attorney General answering brief due 07/06/2021. The optional reply brief is due 21 days from the date of service of the answering brief. [12065747] (DLM) [Entered: 04/06/2021 04:28 PM] |
| Filing 7 Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Opening Brief by Appellants Tomer Graziani and Rachael Katherine Wilmoth. New requested due date is 06/04/2021. [12065578] [21-55190] (Anderson, Lisa) [Entered: 04/06/2021 03:16 PM] |
| Filing 6 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN AssessmentConference, 03/30/2021, 10:00 a.m., PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [12042287] (VS) [Entered: 03/16/2021 08:39 AM] |
| Filing 5 Added Attorney(s) Matthew Patrick Seamon for party(s) Appellee Irene Martin Appellee L. Francis Cissna Appellee Kirstjen Nielsen Appellee Matthew G. Whitaker, in case 21-55190. [12041383] (NAC) [Entered: 03/15/2021 01:57 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Matthew Patrick Seamon (U.S. Dep't of Justice, Civil Division, Office of Immigration Litigation-District Court Section, Ben Franklin Station, P.O. Box 868, Washington, DC 20044) for Appellees L. Francis Cissna, Irene Martin, Kirstjen Nielsen and Matthew G. Whitaker. Date of service: 03/15/2021. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12041373] [21-55190] (Seamon, Matthew) [Entered: 03/15/2021 01:56 PM] |
| Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 03/10/2021. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12031566]. [21-55190] (AD) [Entered: 03/10/2021 06:44 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellants Tomer Graziani and Rachael Katherine Wilmoth Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 03/10/2021. [12031060] [21-55190] (Anderson, Lisa) [Entered: 03/10/2021 02:05 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellants Tomer Graziani and Rachael Katherine Wilmoth Mediation Questionnaire due on 03/10/2021. Appellants Tomer Graziani and Rachael Katherine Wilmoth opening brief due 05/05/2021. Appellees L. Francis Cissna, Irene Martin, Kirstjen Nielsen and Matthew G. Whitaker, Acting Attorney General answering brief due 06/07/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12022869] (RT) [Entered: 03/03/2021 11:52 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
