Grigorii Duralev v. Alejandro Mayorkas
Respondent / Appellee: CHAD F. WOLF, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security and ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security
Petitioner / Appellant: GRIGORII DURALEV
Case Number: 21-55200
Filed: March 5, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (Alien Detainees)

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
August 26, 2022 GRIGORII DURALEV V. ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS

RSS RSS Track this Docket
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 20, 2022 Filing 40 Received 6 paper copies of Reply Brief [ # 36 ] filed by Mr. Grigorii Duralev. [12427090] (SD) [Entered: 04/20/2022 05:21 PM]
April 13, 2022 Filing 39 Filed clerk order: The reply brief [ # 36 ] submitted by Mr. Grigorii Duralev is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 6 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification (attached to the end of each copy of the brief) that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: not applicable. The paper copies shall be submitted to the principal office of the Clerk. [12420005] (LA) [Entered: 04/13/2022 11:48 AM]
April 13, 2022 Filing 38 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: TAH): Based on the representation that modification is limited to the correction of grammatical and typographical errors, the appellants motion (Docket Entry No. [ # 37 ]) for leave to file a substitute reply brief is granted. The Clerk will strike the reply brief at Docket Entry No. [35] and will file the substitute reply brief at Docket Entry No. [ # 36 ]. This order was issued prior to the expiration of time within which a response may be filed. Fed. R. App. P. 27(b). [12419992] (AF) [Entered: 04/13/2022 11:41 AM]
April 11, 2022 Filing 37 Filed (ECF) Appellant Mr. Grigorii Duralev Motion to file substitute or corrected brief. Date of service: 04/11/2022. [12417741] [21-55200] (Duralev, Grigorii) [Entered: 04/11/2022 03:37 PM]
April 10, 2022 Filing 36 Submitted (ECF) Reply Brief for review. Submitted by Appellant Mr. Grigorii Duralev. Date of service: 04/10/2022. [12416698] [21-55200] (Duralev, Grigorii) [Entered: 04/10/2022 08:49 PM]
April 8, 2022 Filing 35 STRICKEN PER ORDER [ # 38 ]. Submitted (ECF) Reply Brief for review. Submitted by Appellant Mr. Grigorii Duralev. Date of service: 04/08/2022. [12416672] [21-55200]--[COURT UPDATE: Updated docket text to reflect content of filing. 04/11/2022 by LA] (Duralev, Grigorii) [Entered: 04/08/2022 08:45 PM]
April 5, 2022 Filing 34 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: SSR): Appellants motion (Docket Entry No. [ # 31 ]) to strike the answering brief as untimely is denied. The optional reply brief is now due within 21 days after the date of this order. [12413116] (WL) [Entered: 04/05/2022 02:13 PM]
February 23, 2022 Filing 33 Received 6 paper copies of Answering Brief [ # 29 ] filed by Alejandro N. Mayorkas. [12378186] (SD) [Entered: 02/23/2022 03:12 PM]
February 23, 2022 Filing 32 Received 3 paper copies of excerpts of record [ # 28 ] in 1 volume(s) filed by Appellee Alejandro N. Mayorkas. [12377680] (KT) [Entered: 02/23/2022 11:22 AM]
February 17, 2022 Filing 31 Filed (ECF) Appellant Mr. Grigorii Duralev Motion to strike whole of Brief for Appellee. Date of service: 02/17/2022. [12373506] [21-55200] (Duralev, Grigorii) [Entered: 02/17/2022 01:41 PM]
February 17, 2022 Filing 30 Filed clerk order: The answering brief [ # 29 ] submitted by Alejandro N. Mayorkas is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 6 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification (attached to the end of each copy of the brief) that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: red. The excerpts of record [ # 28 ] submitted by Alejandro N. Mayorkas are filed. Within 7 days of this order, filer is ordered to file 3 copies of the excerpts in paper format securely bound on the left side, with white covers. The paper copies shall be submitted to the principal office of the Clerk. [12373046] (LA) [Entered: 02/17/2022 09:15 AM]
February 14, 2022 Filing 29 Submitted (ECF) Answering Brief for review. Submitted by Appellee Alejandro N. Mayorkas. Date of service: 02/14/2022. [12370238] [21-55200]--[COURT UPDATE: Attached corrected pdf. 02/17/2022 by LA] (Wilson, Sarah) [Entered: 02/14/2022 11:44 PM]
February 14, 2022 Filing 28 Submitted (ECF) excerpts of record. Submitted by Appellee Alejandro N. Mayorkas. Date of service: 02/14/2022. [12370183] [21-55200]--[COURT UPDATE: Attached corrected excerpts. 02/17/2022 by LA] (Wilson, Sarah) [Entered: 02/14/2022 06:40 PM]
January 18, 2022 Filing 27 Filed (ECF) Appellant Mr. Grigorii Duralev motion for reconsideration of non-dispositive Clerk Order of 01/14/2022. Date of service: 01/18/2022. [12342225] [21-55200]--[COURT UPDATE: Updated docket text to reflect correct ECF filing type. 01/18/2022 by SLM] (Duralev, Grigorii) [Entered: 01/18/2022 01:24 AM]
January 14, 2022 Filing 26 Streamlined request [24] by Appellee Alejandro N. Mayorkas to extend time to file the brief is approved. Amended briefing schedule: Appellee Alejandro N. Mayorkas answering brief due 02/14/2022. The optional reply brief is due 21 days from the date of service of the answering brief. [12341318] (DLM) [Entered: 01/14/2022 12:27 PM]
January 14, 2022 Filing 25 Filed (ECF) Appellant Mr. Grigorii Duralev Correspondence: Objection on the Second Streamlined extension of time to file Answering Brief. Date of service: 01/14/2022 [12340807] [21-55200] (Duralev, Grigorii) [Entered: 01/14/2022 03:28 AM]
January 13, 2022 Filing 24 Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Answering Brief by Appellee Alejandro N. Mayorkas. New requested due date is 02/14/2022. [12340762] [21-55200] (Wilson, Sarah) [Entered: 01/13/2022 07:41 PM]
November 15, 2021 Filing 23 Filed order (Appellate Commissioner): The governments motion for summary disposition (Docket Entry No. [ # 16 ]) is denied because the questions raised in this appeal are sufficient to justify the completion of briefing. See 9th Cir. R. 3-6(a) (stating standard for summary disposition); see also United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857 (9th Cir. 1982). The answering brief is due January 14, 2022. The optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12288115] (AF) [Entered: 11/15/2021 05:50 PM]
September 8, 2021 Filing 22 Attorney Jesi J. Carlson in 21-55200 substituted by Attorney Sarah Stevens Wilson in 21-55200 [12222710] (RR) [Entered: 09/08/2021 10:08 AM]
September 8, 2021 Filing 21 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Sarah Stevens Wilson (U.S. Department of Justice, Ben Franklin Station, PO Box 878, Washington, DC 20044) for Appellee Alejandro N. Mayorkas. Substitution for Attorney Jesi J. Carlson for Appellee Alejandro N. Mayorkas. Date of service: 09/08/2021. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12222437] [21-55200] (Wilson, Sarah) [Entered: 09/08/2021 06:56 AM]
August 31, 2021 Filing 20 Filed (ECF) Appellant Mr. Grigorii Duralev Correspondence: Letter to Clerk. Date of service: 08/31/2021 [12215945] [21-55200] (Duralev, Grigorii) [Entered: 08/31/2021 03:11 AM]
August 26, 2021 Filing 19 Filed (ECF) Appellee Alejandro N. Mayorkas Correspondence: Letter to Clerk. Date of service: 08/26/2021. [12212564] [21-55200]--[COURT UPDATE: Updated docket text to reflect correct ECF filing type. 08/26/2021 by SLM] (Carlson, Jesi) [Entered: 08/26/2021 02:18 PM]
August 12, 2021 Filing 18 Filed order (MARY M. SCHROEDER and ANDREW D. HURWITZ): Appellants request to lift the conditions of release pending appeal (contained in Docket Entry No. [ # 11 ]) is denied. The motion for summary disposition will be addressed by subsequent order. Briefing is suspended pending further court order. [12199866] (AF) [Entered: 08/12/2021 01:47 PM]
August 6, 2021 Filing 17 Filed (ECF) Appellant Mr. Grigorii Duralev response to motion ([ # 16 ] Motion (ECF Filing), [ # 16 ] Motion (ECF Filing) motion for summary disposition). Date of service: 08/06/2021. [12194197] [21-55200] (Duralev, Grigorii) [Entered: 08/06/2021 12:59 PM]
August 4, 2021 Filing 16 Filed (ECF) Appellee Alejandro N. Mayorkas Motion for summary disposition. Date of service: 08/04/2021. [12192473] [21-55200] (Carlson, Jesi) [Entered: 08/04/2021 05:25 PM]
July 21, 2021 Filing 15 Appellee Chad F. Wolf in 21-55200 substituted by Appellee Alejandro N. Mayorkas in 21-55200 [12178844] (TYL) [Entered: 07/21/2021 12:09 PM]
July 15, 2021 Filing 14 Filed (ECF) Appellant Mr. Grigorii Duralev Correspondence: Reply to Appellee's Status Report. Date of service: 07/15/2021 [12173990] [21-55200] (Duralev, Grigorii) [Entered: 07/15/2021 04:36 PM]
July 15, 2021 Filing 13 Filed (ECF) Appellee Chad F. Wolf Correspondence: Status Report. Date of service: 07/15/2021 [12173816] [21-55200] (Carlson, Jesi) [Entered: 07/15/2021 03:01 PM]
July 15, 2021 Filing 12 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: AT): Appellees motion for an extension of time to file the answering brief (Docket Entry No. [ # 10 ]) is granted. The answering brief is due August 30, 2021. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. Appellants request for injunctive relief pending appeal (contained in Docket Entry No. [ # 11 ]) will be addressed in a subsequent order. [12173659] (AF) [Entered: 07/15/2021 01:58 PM]
June 24, 2021 Filing 11 Filed (ECF) Appellant Mr. Grigorii Duralev response to motion ([ # 10 ] Motion (ECF Filing), [ # 10 ] Motion (ECF Filing)). Date of service: 06/24/2021. [12153600] [21-55200] (Duralev, Grigorii) [Entered: 06/24/2021 02:17 PM]
June 24, 2021 Filing 10 Filed (ECF) Appellee Chad F. Wolf Motion to extend time to file Answering brief until 08/30/2021. Date of service: 06/24/2021. [12153459] [21-55200] --[COURT UPDATE: Updated docket text to reflect content of filing. 6/24/2021 by TYL] (Carlson, Jesi) [Entered: 06/24/2021 01:07 PM]
May 21, 2021 Filing 9 Streamlined request [8] by Appellee Chad F. Wolf to extend time to file the brief is approved. Amended briefing schedule: Appellee Chad F. Wolf answering brief due 07/01/2021. The optional reply brief is due 21 days from the date of service of the answering brief. [12121542] (DLM) [Entered: 05/21/2021 04:21 PM]
May 21, 2021 Filing 8 Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Answering Brief by Appellee Chad F. Wolf. New requested due date is 07/01/2021. [12121092] [21-55200] (Carlson, Jesi) [Entered: 05/21/2021 12:57 PM]
May 4, 2021 Filing 7 Received 6 paper copies of Opening Brief [ # 5 ] filed by Mr. Grigorii Duralev. [12102020] (SD) [Entered: 05/04/2021 04:00 PM]
April 30, 2021 Filing 6 Filed clerk order: The opening brief [ # 5 ] submitted by Mr. Grigorii Duralev is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 6 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification (attached to the end of each copy of the brief) that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: not applicable. The paper copies shall be submitted to the principal office of the Clerk. [12098408] (KWG) [Entered: 04/30/2021 02:00 PM]
April 29, 2021 Filing 5 Submitted (ECF) Opening Brief for review. Submitted by Appellant Mr. Grigorii Duralev. Date of service: 04/29/2021. [12096270] [21-55200] (Duralev, Grigorii) [Entered: 04/29/2021 12:49 AM]
March 29, 2021 Filing 4 Added Attorney(s) Jesi J. Carlson for party(s) Appellee Chad F. Wolf, in case 21-55200. [12055899] (DJV) [Entered: 03/29/2021 09:00 AM]
March 29, 2021 Filing 3 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Jesi J. Carlson (U.S. Department of Justice, Ben Franklin Station, PO Box 878, Washington, DC 20044) for Appellee Chad F. Wolf. Date of service: 03/29/2021. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12055853] [21-55200] (Carlson, Jesi) [Entered: 03/29/2021 08:39 AM]
March 5, 2021 Filing 2 Terminated L. Ashley Aull for Chad F. Wolf in 21-55200 [12026064] (TYL) [Entered: 03/05/2021 01:21 PM]
March 5, 2021 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Grigorii Duralev opening brief due 04/30/2021. Appellee Chad F. Wolf answering brief due 06/01/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12025750] (JMR) [Entered: 03/05/2021 10:58 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Grigorii Duralev v. Alejandro Mayorkas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: CHAD F. WOLF, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security
Represented By: Daniel Beck
Represented By: Jesi J. Carlson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security
Represented By: Daniel Beck
Represented By: Sarah Stevens Wilson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: GRIGORII DURALEV
Represented By: Grigorii Duralev
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?