Abraham Yuen v. Christopher Warren
Defendant: DOES, 1-10, inclusive
Petitioner: LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT
Defendant / Appellant: CHRISTOPHER WARREN, Officer; Number 1408, BRAD KELLER, Chief of Police; in his individual and official capacity and CITY OF MONTEBELLO
Plaintiff / Appellee: ABRAHAM YUEN
Case Number: 21-55214
Filed: March 9, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 29, 2021 Filing 8 Terminated Appellants City of Montebello and Brad Keller in 21-55214 [12096548] (AF) [Entered: 04/29/2021 09:40 AM]
April 29, 2021 Filing 7 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: LCC): The stipulated motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal as to appellants City of Montebello and Keller (Docket Entry No. [ # 6 ]) is granted. The appeal is dismissed as to appellants City of Montebello and Keller only. The appeal shall proceed as to appellant Warren. The opening brief and excerpts of record are due June 17, 2021. The answering brief is due July 19, 2021. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. In addition to all other issues the parties wish to raise in their briefs, the parties shall address the basis for this courts jurisdiction over this appeal. See Villanueva v. California, 986 F.3d 1158, 1164 (9th Cir. 2021) (court of appeals has jurisdiction over interlocutory appeal from denial of qualified immunity only to the extent that it turns on an issue of law) (citation omitted). [12096546] (AF) [Entered: 04/29/2021 09:39 AM]
April 21, 2021 Filing 6 Filed (ECF) Appellants City of Montebello, Brad Keller and Christopher Warren Stipulated Motion to dismiss party from case. Date of service: 04/21/2021. [12082783] [21-55214] (Colvin, Roger) [Entered: 04/21/2021 04:35 PM]
April 1, 2021 Filing 5 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: LCC): A review of the record suggests that this court may lack jurisdiction over the appeal filed by the City of Montebello because the order challenged in the appeal may not be final or appealable as to the City. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Horton by Horton v. City of Santa Maria, 915 F.3d 592, 603 (9th Cir. 2019) (The denial of summary judgment to a municipal defendant on a Monell claim is . . . no different from the denial of any ordinary motion for summary judgment, and so is not immediately appealable.); Dougherty v. City of Covina, 654 F.3d 892, 900 (9th Cir. 2011) (Qualified immunity does not shield municipalities from liability.). Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellant City of Montebello shall move for voluntary dismissal of its appeal or show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed as to the City for lack of jurisdiction. If the City elects to show cause, a response may be filed within 10 days after service of the memorandum. If the City of Montebello does not comply with this order, the Clerk shall dismiss the Citys appeal pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. Briefing is suspended pending further order of the court. [12060693] (JMR) [Entered: 04/01/2021 11:38 AM]
March 22, 2021 Filing 4 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL IN AssessmentConference, 04/14/2021, 2:30 p.m., PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [12049620] (LW) [Entered: 03/22/2021 02:59 PM]
March 16, 2021 Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 03/16/2021. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12043695]. [21-55214] (AD) [Entered: 03/16/2021 06:44 PM]
March 16, 2021 Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellants City of Montebello, Brad Keller and Christopher Warren Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 03/16/2021. [12043482] [21-55214] (Colvin, Roger) [Entered: 03/16/2021 04:20 PM]
March 9, 2021 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellants City of Montebello, Brad Keller and Christopher Warren Mediation Questionnaire due on 03/16/2021. Transcript ordered by 04/09/2021. Transcript due 05/07/2021. Appellants City of Montebello, Brad Keller and Christopher Warren opening brief due 06/17/2021. Appellee Abraham Yuen answering brief due 07/19/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12028943] (RT) [Entered: 03/09/2021 09:54 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Abraham Yuen v. Christopher Warren
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: CHRISTOPHER WARREN, Officer; Number 1408
Represented By: Roger Allen Colvin Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: BRAD KELLER, Chief of Police; in his individual and official capacity
Represented By: Roger Allen Colvin Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: CITY OF MONTEBELLO
Represented By: Roger Allen Colvin Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: ABRAHAM YUEN
Represented By: Thomas E. Beck
Represented By: Gary Steven Casselman Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DOES, 1-10, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?