Sylvester Owino, et al v. CoreCivic, Inc.
| SYLVESTER OWINO and JONATHAN GOMEZ, on behalf of themselves, and all others similarly situated |
| CORECIVIC, INC., a Maryland corporation |
| 21-55221 |
| March 10, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 SYLVESTER OWINO V. CORECIVIC, INC.
|
|
SYLVESTER OWINO, ET AL V. CORECIVIC, INC.
|
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant settlement discussions while the appeal is pending. [12068218] (CL) [Entered: 04/08/2021 02:16 PM] |
| Filing 8 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 04/13/2021, 11:00 a.m. PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [12059567] (CL) [Entered: 03/31/2021 01:06 PM] |
| Filing 7 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 03/17/2021. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12045291]. [21-55221] (AD) [Entered: 03/17/2021 06:44 PM] |
| Filing 6 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 03/17/2021. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12045288]. [21-55221] (AD) [Entered: 03/17/2021 06:44 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed (ECF) Appellees Jonathan Gomez and Sylvester Owino Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 03/17/2021. [12045087] [21-55221] (Ridley, Eileen) [Entered: 03/17/2021 04:18 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Appellant CoreCivic, Inc. Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 03/17/2021. [12044799] [21-55221] (Acedo, Nicholas) [Entered: 03/17/2021 02:51 PM] |
| Filing 3 Received notification from District Court re: payment of docket fee. Amount Paid: USD 505.00. Date paid: 03/12/2021. [12039708] (RT) [Entered: 03/12/2021 01:47 PM] |
| Filing 2 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant CoreCivic, Inc. Mediation Questionnaire due on 03/17/2021. Transcript ordered by 04/09/2021. Transcript due 05/10/2021. Appellant CoreCivic, Inc. opening brief due 06/18/2021. Appellees Jonathan Gomez and Sylvester Owino answering brief due 07/19/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12031008] (RT) [Entered: 03/10/2021 01:36 PM] |
| Filing 1 Filed order (MILAN D. SMITH, JR. and PATRICK J. BUMATAY, Circuit Judges ) in case no. 21-80003 on March 10, 2021: Petitioners motion for leave to file a reply (Docket Entry No. 5) is granted. The court, in its discretion, grants the petition for permission to appeal the district courts April 1, 2020 order granting class action certification and January 13, 2021 order denying reconsideration. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(f); Chamberlan v. Ford Motor Co., 402 F.3d 952 (9th Cir. 2005). Within 14 days after the date of this order, petitioner shall perfect the appeal in accordance with Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 5(d). [12031006] (RT) [Entered: 03/10/2021 01:34 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
