Lin Ouyang v. Nora Manella, et al
| NORA M. MANELLA, DANIEL P. POTTER, AUDREY B. COLLINS, Administrative Law Judge, BRIAN S. CURREY, in his official capacity as associate justice of California Court of Appeal Second Appellate District, Div. Four, KIM G. DUNNING, ONE OR MORE UNKNOWN NAMED OFFICERS OF JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF CALIFORNIA, in his/her/their official capacity, NORMAN L. EPSTEIN and DOES, 1 through 150 inclusive |
| LIN OUYANG |
| 21-55251 |
| March 19, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Filed (ECF) Appellant Lin Ouyang response to Court order dated 03/25/2021. Date of service: 04/29/2021. [12096273] [21-55251] (Ouyang, Lin) [Entered: 04/29/2021 05:44 AM] |
| Filing 6 Filed (ECF) Appellant Lin Ouyang response to Court order dated 03/25/2021. Date of service: 03/25/2021. [12054238] --[COURT ENTERED FILING to correct entry [4] .] (TYL) [Entered: 03/26/2021 09:57 AM] |
| Filing 5 Filed (ECF) Appellant Lin Ouyang Motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Date of service: 03/25/2021. [12054237] --[COURT ENTERED FILING to correct entry [4] .] (TYL) [Entered: 03/26/2021 09:56 AM] |
| Filing 4 COURT DELETED INCORRECT ENTRY. Notice about deletion sent to case participants registered for electronic filing. Correct Entries: [ # 5 ] and [ # 6 ]. Original Text: Filed (ECF) Appellant Lin Ouyang Affidavit Accompanying Motion for Permission to Appeal In Forma Pauperis (Form 4). Date of service: 03/25/2021. [12053929] [21-55251] (Ouyang, Lin) [Entered: 03/25/2021 10:57 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: JW): A review of the district courts docket reflects that the district court denied appellant leave to proceed in forma pauperis because it found that the action was frivolous. This court may dismiss a case at any time, if the court determines the case is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days after the date of this order, appellant must: (1) file a motion to dismiss this appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), or (2) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. If appellant does not respond to this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute, without further notice. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellant files a motion to dismiss the appeal, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). If appellant submits any response to this order other than a motion to dismiss the appeal, the court may dismiss this appeal as frivolous, without further notice. The briefing schedule for this appeal is stayed. The Clerk shall serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, and (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward. Appellant may use the enclosed forms for any motion to dismiss the appeal or statement that the appeal should go forward. [12053545] (CKP) [Entered: 03/25/2021 02:11 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed Appellant Lin Ouyang motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 03/15/2021. [12047277] (JPD) [Entered: 03/19/2021 10:29 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANC OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Lin Ouyang opening brief due 05/14/2021. [12047246] (JPD) [Entered: 03/19/2021 10:15 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
