Kim Allen, et al v. Hylands, Inc., et al
YUANKE XU, MELISSA NIGH, on behalf of themselves, all others similarly situated, and the general public, DIANA SISTI, DANIEL XENOS, KIM ALLEN, NANCY RODRIGUEZ and SHERRELL SMITH |
STANDARD HOMEOPATHIC COMPANY and HYLANDS, INC., a California corporation |
21-55289 |
March 26, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 Streamlined request [8] by Appellants Kim Allen, Melissa Nigh, Nancy Rodriguez, Diana Sisti, Sherrell Smith, Daniel Xenos and Yuanke Xu to extend time to file the brief is approved. Amended briefing schedule: Appellants Kim Allen, Melissa Nigh, Nancy Rodriguez, Diana Sisti, Sherrell Smith, Daniel Xenos and Yuanke Xu opening brief due 06/23/2021. Appellees Hylands, Inc. and Standard Homeopathic Company answering brief due 07/23/2021. The optional reply brief is due 21 days from the date of service of the answering brief. [12118998] (JN) [Entered: 05/20/2021 07:41 AM] |
Filing 8 Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Opening Brief by Appellants Kim Allen, Melissa Nigh, Nancy Rodriguez, Diana Sisti, Sherrell Smith, Daniel Xenos and Yuanke Xu. New requested due date is 06/23/2021. [12117613] [21-55289] (Houchin, Michael) [Entered: 05/19/2021 08:59 AM] |
Filing 7 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator by email should circumstances develop that warrant settlement discussions while the appeal is pending. [12099312] (VS) [Entered: 05/03/2021 09:27 AM] |
Filing 6 MEDIATION CONFERENCE RESCHEDULED - DIAL-IN AssessmentConference, 04/30/2021, 1:00 p.m. Pacific Time. (originally scheduled on 04/26/2021 ). [12086290] (VS) [Entered: 04/26/2021 10:16 AM] |
Filing 5 MEDIATION CONFERENCE RESCHEDULED - DIAL-IN AssessmentConference, 04/26/2021, 1:00 p.m. Pacific Time. (originally scheduled on 04/27/2021 ). [12073816] (VS) [Entered: 04/14/2021 11:01 AM] |
Filing 4 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN AssessmentConference, 04/27/2021, 11:00 a.m., PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [12073132] (VS) [Entered: 04/13/2021 04:18 PM] |
Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 04/01/2021. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12061335]. [21-55289] (AD) [Entered: 04/01/2021 06:44 PM] |
Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellants Kim Allen, Melissa Nigh, Nancy Rodriguez, Diana Sisti, Sherrell Smith, Daniel Xenos and Yuanke Xu Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 04/01/2021. [12060810] [21-55289] (Marron, Ronald) [Entered: 04/01/2021 12:50 PM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellants Kim Allen, Melissa Nigh, Nancy Rodriguez, Diana Sisti, Sherrell Smith, Daniel Xenos and Yuanke Xu Mediation Questionnaire due on 04/02/2021. Appellants Kim Allen, Melissa Nigh, Nancy Rodriguez, Diana Sisti, Sherrell Smith, Daniel Xenos and Yuanke Xu opening brief due 05/24/2021. Appellees Hylands, Inc. and Standard Homeopathic Company answering brief due 06/23/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12054798] (JBS) [Entered: 03/26/2021 01:45 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.