Punaofo Tilei v. CDCR, et al
DOES, 1-10, PEYMAN SHAKIBA, Doctor; Physician at RJD, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION, DAVID CLAYTON, Doctor; Physician at RJD, SAHA, Doctor; Physician at RJD and JASHUA N. DOROS, Physician at Alvarado Medical Center Hospital (AH) |
PUNAOFO TSUGITO TILEI |
21-55327 |
April 7, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Filed Appellant Punaofo Tsugito Tilei motion to appoint pro bono counsel. Deficiencies: None. [12106348] (RR) [Entered: 05/07/2021 03:49 PM] |
Filing 5 CLERK ORDER FILED (Deputy Clerk CKP) Prisoner completed authorization fee order. [12077804] (CKP) [Entered: 04/16/2021 03:34 PM] |
Filing 4 Received PLRA authorization response from appellant. Dated 04/13/2021. [12077681] (RR) [Entered: 04/16/2021 02:43 PM] |
Filing 3 Filed original and 0 copies of Appellant Punaofo Tsugito Tilei opening brief of 24 pages (Informal: Yes). Served on 04/13/2021. [12077113] (LA) [Entered: 04/16/2021 11:21 AM] |
Filing 2 CLERK ORDER FILED (Deputy Clerk CKP) Prisoner fee authorization form sent to prisoner. [12068797] (CKP) [Entered: 04/09/2021 01:23 AM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Punaofo Tsugito Tilei opening brief due 06/04/2021. Appellees California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, David Clayton, Does, Jashua N. Doros, Saha and Peyman Shakiba answering brief due 07/06/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12066448] (JMR) [Entered: 04/07/2021 11:37 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.