Steven Brown v. LASD, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: STEVEN DWAYNE BROWN
Defendant / Appellee: LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, DEPUTY SAUCEDO, as individual and in official capacity as Deputy Sheriff, SERGEANT MORALES, as individual and in official capacity as Deputy Sergeant 1700 High Power, DEPUTY PENA, Deputy Sheriff Escort Prowler as individual, DOMINGUEZ, Deputy Sheriff; individual and DOES, 1-10
Case Number: 21-55375
Filed: April 19, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
November 15, 2022 STEVEN BROWN V. LASD, ET AL

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 15, 2021 Filing 6 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: JW): On April 29, 2021, this court ordered appellant to complete and file with this court the enclosed authorization form. To date, appellant has not complied with the courts order. Although appellants forma pauperis status continues in this court, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1) and (2), incarcerated appellants proceeding in forma pauperis must pay the full amount of the filing and docketing fees when funds are available in appellants account. Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellant shall have one final opportunity to sign and file with this court the enclosed authorization form, which directs the prison officials at appellants institution to assess, collect, and forward to the court the $505.00 filing and docketing fees for this appeal on a monthly basis whenever funds exist in appellants trust fund account. These fees will continue to be collected regardless of the date or manner of disposition of this appeal. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(2) and (e)(2). Appellant is not responsible for payment when the funds in appellants prison trust account total less than $10.00, but payments must resume when additional deposits are made or funds are otherwise available. If appellant fails to comply with this order, the appeal will be dismissed by the Clerk. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. The briefing schedule established on June 7, 2021 remains in effect. [12144854] (CKP) [Entered: 06/15/2021 01:33 PM]
June 7, 2021 Filing 5 Streamlined request by Appellant Steven Dwayne Brown to extend time to file the brief is approved in part. Streamlined requests only allow for a 30 day extension of time to file the brief. Amended briefing schedule: Appellant Steven Dwayne Brown opening brief due 07/14/2021. Appellees Deputy Pena, Deputy Saucedo, Does, Dominguez, Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department and Sergeant Morales answering brief due 08/13/2021. The optional reply brief is due 21 days from the date of service of the answering brief. [12135669] (JN) [Entered: 06/07/2021 11:33 AM]
June 2, 2021 Filing 4 Filed order MEDIATION (RSK): This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. [12131746] (JMR) [Entered: 06/02/2021 03:35 PM]
May 6, 2021 Filing 3 Filed order MEDIATION (RSK): The Mediation Program of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals facilitates settlement while appeals are pending. See Fed. R. App. P. 33 and Ninth Cir. R. 33-1. As part of a pilot project, the Mediation Program is exploring settlement potential in some cases in which one party is proceeding pro se (representing themselves without the assistance of an attorney). This case is being included in the pilot project. By May 19, 2021, the parties are requested to inform the Circuit Mediator in writing whether the issues on appeal or the underlying dispute might be appropriate for settlement discussions. The written response to this order and all future written or spoken communication with the mediator are strictly confidential mediation communications protected by Ninth Circuit Rule 33-1 and cannot be disclosed outside the mediation process. The written response to this order should not be filed with the court; instead, the response should be sent directly to the Circuit Mediator by email (robert_kaiser@ca9.uscourts.gov) or mail (Robert Kaiser, Circuit Mediation Office, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, James R. Browning United States Courthouse, P.O. Box 193939, San Francisco, CA 94119-3939). More detailed information about the Mediation Program and its procedures are included in the attachment to this order and on the Mediation Program web site (www.ca9.uscourts.gov/mediation). The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. [12104708] (WL) [Entered: 05/06/2021 01:34 PM]
April 29, 2021 Filing 2 CLERK ORDER FILED (Deputy Clerk CKP) Prisoner fee authorization form sent to prisoner. [12096907] (CKP) [Entered: 04/29/2021 01:02 PM]
April 19, 2021 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Steven Dwayne Brown opening brief due 06/14/2021. Appellees Deputy Pena, Deputy Saucedo, Does, Dominguez, Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department and Sergeant Morales answering brief due 07/14/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12078659] (JBS) [Entered: 04/19/2021 10:22 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Steven Brown v. LASD, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: STEVEN DWAYNE BROWN
Represented By: Steven Dwayne Brown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: DEPUTY SAUCEDO, as individual and in official capacity as Deputy Sheriff
Represented By: Jonathan Redford
Represented By: Joseph Anthony Gordon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: SERGEANT MORALES, as individual and in official capacity as Deputy Sergeant 1700 High Power
Represented By: Jonathan Redford
Represented By: Joseph Anthony Gordon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: DEPUTY PENA, Deputy Sheriff Escort Prowler as individual
Represented By: Jonathan Redford
Represented By: Joseph Anthony Gordon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: DOMINGUEZ, Deputy Sheriff; individual
Represented By: Jonathan Redford
Represented By: Joseph Anthony Gordon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: DOES, 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?