Jeff Sikking, et al v. USHUD, et al

Jeff Sikking, et al v. USHUD, et al

Defendant / Appellee:	REGIS A. GUERIN, in his corporate and individual capacities, JPMORGAN CHASE CUSTODY SERVICES, INC., in its corporate capacity, CITY OF SAN DIEGO, in its corporate & municipal capacities, ARCOLA FREEMAN, in his or her individual and corporate capacities, JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., in its corporate capacity, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, a municipal corporation; in their corporate and municipal capacities, DOES, 1-20 inclusive, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, a federal agency in its official capacity, SAN DIEGO CITY PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT, CODE ENFORCEMENT DIVISION, in its corporate & municipal capacities, RICHARDSON C. GRISWOLD, in his official & individual capacity, MARA W. ELLIOTT, in her official and individual capacities, DORIS O. BRITTON, KEMA FREEMAN, in his or her individual and corporate capacities and ONU OMORDIA, in his or her official and individual capacities
Plaintiff / Appellant:	BARBARA SIKKING, LEON-QIYAM POGUE and JEFF SIKKING
Case Number:	21-55396
Filed:	April 22, 2021
Court:	U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit:	Other

RSS Track this Docket

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed	Document Text
June 15, 2021	Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: DA): A review of the district court record reflects that the notice of appeal states the appeal is being taken by Leon-Qiyam Pogue, et al. However, the notice of appeal is signed only by appellant Leon-Qiyam Pogue. See Fed. R. App. P. 3(c)(2) (notice of appeal considered filed on behalf of the signer); see also Becker v. Montgomery, 532 U.S. 757, 765 (2001) (pro se litigants failure to sign the notice of appeal is a nonjurisdictional, and therefore, curable defect); McKinney v. Debord, 507 F.2d 501 (9th Cir. 1974) (pro se appellant must personally sign notice of appeal). Plaintiffs Jeff and Barbara Sikking have not responded to the district courts April 19, 2021 order requiring clarification of the notice of appeal. Within 21 days after the date of this order, Jeff Sikking and Barbara Sikking shall correct the defect by filing a personally signed copy of the notice of appeal in the district court if they intend to prosecute the appeal. A review of the district court docket also reflects that appellants have not paid the docketing and filing fees for this appeal. Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellant shall either: (1) file a motion with this court to proceed in forma pauperis accompanied by a completed Form 4 affidavit; or (2) pay $505.00 to the district court as the docketing and filing fees for this appeal and provide proof of payment to this court. The Clerk shall serve a Form 4 financial affidavit on appellant. The filing of a motion to proceed in forma pauperis will automatically stay the briefing schedule under Ninth Circuit Rule 27-11. Failure to comply with this order will result in the dismissal of Jeff Sikking and Barbara Sikking as appellants in this appeal by the Clerk under Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. The briefing schedule is stayed pending further order of the court. [12144954] (CKP) [Entered: 06/15/2021 02:11 PM]
April 22, 2021	Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANTS. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellants Leon-Qiyam Pogue, Barbara Sikking and Jeff Sikking opening brief due 06/24/2021. Appellees Doris O. Britton, City of San Diego, Does, Mara W. Elliott, Arcola Freeman, Kema Freeman, Richardson C. Griswold, Regis A. Guerin, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., JPMorgan Chase Custody Services, Inc., Onu Omordia, People of the State of California, San Diego City Planning & Development, Code Enforcement Division and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development answering brief due 07/26/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12083114] (RT) [Entered: 04/22/2021 09:19 AM]

Date Filed

Document Text

June 15, 2021

Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: DA): A review of the district court record reflects that the notice of appeal states the appeal is being taken by Leon-Qiyam Pogue, et al. However, the notice of appeal is signed only by appellant Leon-Qiyam Pogue. See Fed. R. App. P. 3(c)(2) (notice of appeal considered filed on behalf of the signer); see also Becker v. Montgomery, 532 U.S. 757, 765 (2001) (pro se litigants failure to sign the notice of appeal is a nonjurisdictional, and therefore, curable defect); McKinney v. Debord, 507 F.2d 501 (9th Cir. 1974) (pro se appellant must personally sign notice of appeal). Plaintiffs Jeff and Barbara Sikking have not responded to the district courts April 19, 2021 order requiring clarification of the notice of appeal. Within 21 days after the date of this order, Jeff Sikking and Barbara Sikking shall correct the defect by filing a personally signed copy of the notice of appeal in the district court if they intend to prosecute the appeal. A review of the district court docket also reflects that appellants have not paid the docketing and filing fees for this appeal. Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellant shall either: (1) file a motion with this court to proceed in forma pauperis accompanied by a completed Form 4 affidavit; or (2) pay $505.00 to the district court as the docketing and filing fees for this appeal and provide proof of payment to this court. The Clerk shall serve a Form 4 financial affidavit on appellant. The filing of a motion to proceed in forma pauperis will automatically stay the briefing schedule under Ninth Circuit Rule 27-11. Failure to comply with this order will result in the dismissal of Jeff Sikking and Barbara Sikking as appellants in this appeal by the Clerk under Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. The briefing schedule is stayed pending further order of the court. [12144954] (CKP) [Entered: 06/15/2021 02:11 PM]

April 22, 2021

Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANTS. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellants Leon-Qiyam Pogue, Barbara Sikking and Jeff Sikking opening brief due 06/24/2021. Appellees Doris O. Britton, City of San Diego, Does, Mara W. Elliott, Arcola Freeman, Kema Freeman, Richardson C. Griswold, Regis A. Guerin, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., JPMorgan Chase Custody Services, Inc., Onu Omordia, People of the State of California, San Diego City Planning & Development, Code Enforcement Division and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development answering brief due 07/26/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12083114] (RT) [Entered: 04/22/2021 09:19 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Jeff Sikking, et al v. USHUD, et al
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: REGIS A. GUERIN, in his corporate and individual capacities
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: JPMORGAN CHASE CUSTODY SERVICES, INC., in its corporate capacity
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CITY OF SAN DIEGO, in its corporate & municipal capacities
Represented By:	Steven Ray Guess
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: ARCOLA FREEMAN, in his or her individual and corporate capacities
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., in its corporate capacity
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, a municipal corporation; in their corporate and municipal capacities
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: DOES, 1-20 inclusive
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, a federal agency in its official capacity
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: SAN DIEGO CITY PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT, CODE ENFORCEMENT DIVISION, in its corporate & municipal capacities
Represented By:	Steven Ray Guess
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: RICHARDSON C. GRISWOLD, in his official & individual capacity
Represented By:	Richardson C. Griswold
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: MARA W. ELLIOTT, in her official and individual capacities
Represented By:	Steven Ray Guess
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: DORIS O. BRITTON
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: KEMA FREEMAN, in his or her individual and corporate capacities
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: ONU OMORDIA, in his or her official and individual capacities
Represented By:	Steven Ray Guess
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: BARBARA SIKKING
Represented By:	Barbara Sikking
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: LEON-QIYAM POGUE
Represented By:	Leon-Qiyam Pogue
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: JEFF SIKKING
Represented By:	Jeff Sikking
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?