Marco Amaral v. City of San Diego, et al
Defendant / Appellee: CITY OF SAN DIEGO and JEFFREY WILLIAMS, previously sued as FNU Williams, an individual
Plaintiff / Appellant: MARCO AMARAL
Case Number: 21-55420
Filed: April 28, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
May 26, 2022 MARCO AMARAL V. CITY OF SAN DIEGO

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 25, 2021 Filing 5 Streamlined request [4] by Appellant Marco Amaral to extend time to file the brief is approved. Amended briefing schedule: Appellant Marco Amaral opening brief due 07/28/2021. Appellees City of San Diego and Jeffrey Williams answering brief due 08/27/2021. The optional reply brief is due 21 days from the date of service of the answering brief. [12155222] (JN) [Entered: 06/25/2021 04:23 PM]
June 25, 2021 Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Opening Brief by Appellant Marco Amaral. New requested due date is 07/28/2021. [12155206] [21-55420] (Bebi, Gastone) [Entered: 06/25/2021 04:16 PM]
May 4, 2021 Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 05/04/2021. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12102234]. [21-55420] (AD) [Entered: 05/04/2021 06:44 PM]
May 4, 2021 Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant Marco Amaral Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 05/04/2021. [12101970] [21-55420] (Bebi, Gastone) [Entered: 05/04/2021 03:42 PM]
April 28, 2021 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Marco Amaral Mediation Questionnaire due on 05/05/2021. Appellant Marco Amaral opening brief due 06/28/2021. Appellees City of San Diego and Jeffrey Williams answering brief due 07/28/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12090420] (JBS) [Entered: 04/28/2021 04:33 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Marco Amaral v. City of San Diego, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CITY OF SAN DIEGO
Represented By: Kathy J. Steinman
Represented By: Seetal Tejura
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: JEFFREY WILLIAMS, previously sued as FNU Williams, an individual
Represented By: Kathy J. Steinman
Represented By: Seetal Tejura
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: MARCO AMARAL
Represented By: Gastone Bebi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?