Smita Sanghvi, et al v. County of San Bernardino, et al
| WISE & HEALTHY AGING LONG TERM CARE OMBUDSMAN, JESSE ROE, CINTY K. SANCHEZ, EDUARDO DE LA CRUZ and DOES |
| MOUNTAIN VIEW CENTERS, INC. and SMITA SANGHVI |
| COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, a municipal corporation, ADRIANE PICAZO, erroneously sued as Adrien Picaso and JESSE ARCHER, erroneously sued as Jesse Roes |
| 21-55422 |
| April 29, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| SMITA SANGHVI V. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant settlement discussions while the appeal is pending. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. [12136968] (MS) [Entered: 06/08/2021 09:09 AM] |
| Filing 6 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: By 06/07/2021, counsel to email Circuit Mediator regarding settlement potential. Include Ninth Circuit case name and number in subject line. This communication will be kept confidential, if requested, and should not be filed with the court. The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. [12126365] (LW) [Entered: 05/27/2021 09:09 AM] |
| Filing 5 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 05/21/2021. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12121776]. [21-55422] (AD) [Entered: 05/22/2021 06:44 AM] |
| Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Appellants Mountain View Centers, Inc. and Smita Sanghvi Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 05/21/2021. [12121739] [21-55422] (Weiser, Frank) [Entered: 05/21/2021 06:48 PM] |
| Filing 3 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: The court of appeals' records do not indicate that appellant has filed a mediation questionnaire in accordance with Cir. R. 3-4. Within seven (7) days of the filing date of this order, appellant shall file a Mediation Questionnaire or dismiss the appeal voluntarily. [12113682] (LW) [Entered: 05/14/2021 02:28 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellants Mountain View Centers, Inc. and Smita Sanghvi Mediation Questionnaire due on 05/06/2021. Appellants Mountain View Centers, Inc. and Smita Sanghvi opening brief due 06/29/2021. Appellees Jesse Archer, County of San Bernardino and Adriane Picazo answering brief due 07/29/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12096435] (RT) [Entered: 04/29/2021 08:57 AM] |
| Filing 2 Deleted Incorrect Entry [12096534] (RT) [Entered: 04/29/2021 09:34 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
