Jared Martin v. Superior Court of the State of, et al
| SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, County of Los Angeles and PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA |
| JARED MARTIN |
| 21-55481 |
| May 11, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Filed Appellant Jared Martin motion to voluntarily dismiss appeal. Deficiencies: Case Closed per 05/26/21 order. Served on 05/27/2021. [12139920] (RL) [Entered: 06/10/2021 08:44 AM] |
| Filing 6 Filed order (Deputy Clerk: CKP) Granting Motion to dismiss the case pursuant to rule 42b filed by Appellant Jared Martin. This order shall constitute the mandate. [12125507] (CKP) [Entered: 05/26/2021 01:46 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed Appellant Jared Martin request to dismiss case (document formatted as letter). Deficiencies: None. No service date [12124403] (RL) [Entered: 05/25/2021 03:52 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: JW): A review of the district courts docket reflects that the district court has certified that this appeal is not taken in good faith and has revoked appellants in forma pauperis status. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a). This court may dismiss a case at any time, if the court determines the case is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days after the date of this order, appellant must: (1) file a motion to dismiss this appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), or (2) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellant also must: (1) file in this court a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, OR (2) pay to the district court $505.00 for the filing and docketing fees for this appeal AND file in this court proof that the $505.00 was paid. If appellant does not respond to this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute, without further notice. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellant files a motion to dismiss the appeal, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). If appellant submits any response to this order other than a motion to dismiss the appeal, the court may dismiss this appeal as frivolous, without further notice. If the court dismisses the appeal as frivolous, this appeal may be counted as a strike under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). The briefing schedule for this appeal is stayed. The Clerk shall serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward, and (3) a Form 4 financial affidavit. Appellant may use the enclosed forms for any motion to dismiss the appeal, statement that the appeal should go forward, and/or motion to proceed in forma pauperis. [12118930] (CKP) [Entered: 05/20/2021 04:06 AM] |
| Filing 3 Received copy of District Court order filed on 05/18/2021 ORDER In Chambers. Here, Martins Notice of Appeal does not address this Courts dismissal whatsoever. (See Not. of Appeal.) Thus, the Court finds the appeal is frivolous and, therefore, not taken in good faith. Accordingly, the Court REVOKES in forma pauperis status for purposes of this appeal. IT IS SO ORDERED. [12117985] (RL) [Entered: 05/19/2021 11:44 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed referral notice (Deputy Clerk:CKP): Referring to the district court for determination whether in forma pauperis status should continue for this appeal. [12113415] (CKP) [Entered: 05/14/2021 12:57 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Jared Martin opening brief due 07/12/2021. [12109549] (RT) [Entered: 05/11/2021 03:10 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
