Kelvin Hernandez Roman, et al v. Alejandro Mayorkas, et al
Petitioner: MIGUEL AGUILAR ESTRADA, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, BEATRIZ ANDREA FORERO CHAVEZ and KELVIN HERNANDEZ ROMAN
Respondent: U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, ERNEST M. SANTACRUZ, Jr., Acting Director of the Los Angeles Field Office, Enforcement and Removal Operations,, JAMES JANECKA, Warden, Adelanto ICE Processing Center,, TAE JOHNSON, Acting Director, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security;
Case Number: 21-55510
Filed: May 18, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 14, 2021 Filing 7 Filed AMENDED order MEDIATION (SJS): The courts order of June 8, 2021 is amended as follows: A video mediation will be held on July 15, 2021, at 10:00 a.m. Pacific Time, with Circuit Mediator, Steven Saltiel....In lieu of mediation statements, counsel for Petitioners-Appellees shall provide via email a settlement proposal to counsel for Respondents-Appellants on or before June 15, 2021. Counsel for Respondents-Appellants shall respond by email to the proposal on or before June 29, 2021. The settlement proposal and response shall not be filed with the court, but shall be submitted to the Circuit Mediator via e-mail [steven_saltiel@ca9.uscourts.gov]. The parties will be expected to sign the confidentiality agreement attached as Exhibit A to this order. Participants should plan to spend the entire day engaged in meaningful settlement discussions and come prepared with thoughtful solutions to this dispute. It is recommended that counsel review with their clients the information contained in the Mediation Program web site: http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/mediation with particular emphasis on section E Preparing for Mediation. (SEE ORDER FOR FULL TEXT) [12143843] [20-56026, 20-56257, 20-56329, 21-55510] (WL) [Entered: 06/14/2021 04:44 PM]
June 8, 2021 Filing 6 Filed order MEDIATION (SJS): A video mediation will be held on July 15, 2021, at 10:00 a.m. Pacific Time, with Circuit Mediator, Steven Saltiel. Unless excused by the Circuit Mediator prior to the scheduled conference, each party shall be represented by counsel of record and a client representative having full authority to negotiate and settle the case on any terms at the conference. No later than seven (7) days before the mediation, counsel is requested to inform the mediator by email of the names and email address of planned participants. Each participant will receive an email with video instructions only they can use to participate in the conference..... In lieu of mediation statements, counsel for Petitioners-Appellees shall provide via email a settlement proposal to counsel for Respondents-Appellants on or before June 11, 2021. Counsel for Respondents-Appellants shall respond by email to the proposal on or before June 25, 2021. The settlement proposal and response shall not be filed with the court, but shall be submitted to the Circuit Mediator via e-mail [steven_saltiel@ca9.uscourts.gov]. The parties will be expected to sign the confidentiality agreement attached as Exhibit A to this order... (SEE ORDER FOR FULL TEXT) [12137276] [20-56026, 20-56257, 20-56329, 21-55510] (WL) [Entered: 06/08/2021 10:58 AM]
June 3, 2021 Filing 5 Filed order MEDIATION (SJS): Appeal no. 21-55510 is consolidated with Appeal Nos. 20-56026, 20-56257 and 20-56329. The briefing schedules are vacated for these consolidated appeals. [12132851] [20-56026, 20-56257, 20-56329, 21-55510] (WL) [Entered: 06/03/2021 01:37 PM]
May 21, 2021 Filing 4 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 05/21/2021. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12121736]. [21-55510] (AD) [Entered: 05/21/2021 06:44 PM]
May 21, 2021 Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Appellants James Janecka, Tae Johnson, Alejandro N. Mayorkas, Ernest M. Santacruz, Jr. and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 05/21/2021. [12121273] [21-55510] (Chen, Hans) [Entered: 05/21/2021 02:30 PM]
May 18, 2021 Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: TSP): The appeal filed May 10, 2021, is a preliminary injunction appeal. Accordingly, Ninth Circuit Rule 3-3 shall apply. The mediation questionnaire is due three days after the date of this order. If they have not already done so, within 7 calendar days after the filing date of this order, the parties shall make arrangements to obtain from the court reporter an official transcript of proceedings in the district court that will be included in the record on appeal. The briefing schedule shall proceed as follows: the opening brief and excerpts of record are due not later than June 7, 2021; the answering brief is due July 6, 2021 or 28 days after service of the opening brief, whichever is earlier; and the optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. See 9th Cir. R. 3-3(b). No streamlined extensions of time will be approved. See 9th Cir. R. 31-2.2(a)(3). Any request for an extension of time to file a brief must be made by written motion under Ninth Circuit Rule 31-2.2(b). Failure to file timely the opening brief shall result in the automatic dismissal of this appeal by the Clerk for failure to prosecute. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [12117319] (AF) [Entered: 05/18/2021 04:47 PM]
May 17, 2021 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: to be set. Preliminary Injunction Appeal. C.R. 3-3. [12116480] (RT) [Entered: 05/18/2021 11:12 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Kelvin Hernandez Roman, et al v. Alejandro Mayorkas, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: MIGUEL AGUILAR ESTRADA, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Represented By: Margaret Allison Upshaw
Represented By: Samir Deger-Sen
Represented By: Jessica Karp Bansal
Represented By: Michael Kaufman
Represented By: William M. Friedman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: BEATRIZ ANDREA FORERO CHAVEZ
Represented By: Margaret Allison Upshaw
Represented By: Samir Deger-Sen
Represented By: Jessica Karp Bansal
Represented By: Michael Kaufman
Represented By: William M. Friedman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: KELVIN HERNANDEZ ROMAN
Represented By: Margaret Allison Upshaw
Represented By: Samir Deger-Sen
Represented By: Jessica Karp Bansal
Represented By: Michael Kaufman
Represented By: William M. Friedman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT
Represented By: Hans Harris Chen
Represented By: Victor Manuel Mercado-Santana
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: ERNEST M. SANTACRUZ, Jr., Acting Director of the Los Angeles Field Office, Enforcement and Removal Operations,
Represented By: Hans Harris Chen
Represented By: Victor Manuel Mercado-Santana
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: JAMES JANECKA, Warden, Adelanto ICE Processing Center,
Represented By: Hans Harris Chen
Represented By: Victor Manuel Mercado-Santana
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: TAE JOHNSON, Acting Director, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Represented By: Hans Harris Chen
Represented By: Victor Manuel Mercado-Santana
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security;
Represented By: Hans Harris Chen
Represented By: Victor Manuel Mercado-Santana
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?