Darryl Cotton v. Larry Geraci, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: DARRYL COTTON, an individual
Defendant / Appellee: DAVID S. DEMIAN, an individual, JOEL R. WOHLFEIL, an individual, GINA M. AUSTIN, an individual, CYNTHIA A. BASHANT, an individual, REBECCA BERRY, an individual, JESSICA CLAIRE MCELFRESH, an individual, LARRY GERACI, an individual and MICHAEL WEINSTEIN, an individual
Case Number: 21-55519
Filed: May 19, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 6, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 6, 2021 Filing 5 MANDATE ISSUED. (BGS, JHN and RDN) [12163276] (RR) [Entered: 07/06/2021 11:27 AM]
June 11, 2021 Filing 4 Added Attorney(s) Douglas A. Pettit for party(s) Appellee Gina M. Austin, in case 21-55519. [12141999] (RR) [Entered: 06/11/2021 01:42 PM]
June 11, 2021 Filing 3 Filed order (BARRY G. SILVERMAN, JACQUELINE H. NGUYEN and RYAN D. NELSON): A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Chacon v. Babcock, 640 F.2d 221, 222 (9th Cir. 1981) (order is not appealable unless it disposes of all claims as to all parties or judgment is entered in compliance with rule); see also WMX Techs., Inc. v. Miller, 104 F.3d 1133, 1136 (9th Cir. 1997) (dismissal of complaint with leave to amend is not appealable). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. DISMISSED. [12141803] (AF) [Entered: 06/11/2021 11:55 AM]
June 11, 2021 Filing 2 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Douglas A. Pettit (Pettit Kohn Ingrassia Lutz & Dolin, P.C., 11622 El Camino Real, Suite 300, San Diego, CA 92130) for Appellee Gina M. Austin. Date of service: 06/11/2021. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12141521] [21-55519] (Pettit, Douglas) [Entered: 06/11/2021 09:21 AM]
May 19, 2021 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Darryl Cotton opening brief due 07/13/2021. Appellees Gina M. Austin, Cynthia A. Bashant, Rebecca Berry, David S. Demian, Larry Geraci, Jessica Claire McElfresh, Michael Weinstein and Joel R. Wohlfeil answering brief due 08/12/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12117791] (JBS) [Entered: 05/19/2021 10:28 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Darryl Cotton v. Larry Geraci, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: DARRYL COTTON, an individual
Represented By: Darryl Cotton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: DAVID S. DEMIAN, an individual
Represented By: Corinne Bertsche
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: JOEL R. WOHLFEIL, an individual
Represented By: Carmela Duke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: GINA M. AUSTIN, an individual
Represented By: Julia Dalzell
Represented By: Douglas A. Pettit
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CYNTHIA A. BASHANT, an individual
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: REBECCA BERRY, an individual
Represented By: James Donald Crosby
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: JESSICA CLAIRE MCELFRESH, an individual
Represented By: Laura E. Stewart
Represented By: Laura Stewart
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: LARRY GERACI, an individual
Represented By: James Donald Crosby
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: MICHAEL WEINSTEIN, an individual
Represented By: Gregory Brian Emdee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?