Eric Robinson v. Kairn Borzakian, et al
| MALISA CHESSLOCK, individual capacity, JANE DOE, 1-5, KAIRN BORZAKIAN, individual capacity, JOHN DOE, 1-5, RUBY ARIAS, District Attorney individual capacity, DANIEL FELDSTURN, Judge, individual capacity, SUSAN TANNENBAWM, LOS ANGELES COUNTY and MALISA DECKER, individual capacity |
| ERIC ROBINSON |
| 21-55599 |
| June 8, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 22, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: AT): Appellants motion for an extension of time to pay the filing and docketing fees (Docket Entry No. [ # 3 ]) is granted. The $505 filing and docketing fees are now due September 30, 2021. Alternatively, appellant may file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis on or before September 30, 2021. Appellant is informed that the district court will not accept partial payments. Briefing is suspended until the fee status for this appeal has been resolved. [12151458] (AF) [Entered: 06/22/2021 04:36 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Appellant Eric Robinson motion for payments on Court fees in 3 months. Deficiencies: None. [12146637] (NAC) [Entered: 06/16/2021 11:06 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CKP): Order to show cause docket fee due [12138287] (CKP) [Entered: 06/09/2021 12:08 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Eric Robinson opening brief due 07/23/2021. [12137404] (JPD) [Entered: 06/08/2021 11:42 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
