Anthony Johnson v. Manuel Altamirano, et al
| DAVID KINNEY, SEAN SULLIVAN, an individual, RICHARD TURNER, DOES, 1-5 inclusive, MANUEL ALTAMIRANO, an individual, DAVID HUFFMAN, PAUL TYRELL and STORIX, INC. |
| ANTHONY J. JOHNSON |
| 21-55614 |
| June 14, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| ANTHONY JOHNSON V. MANUEL ALTAMIRANO |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Received 6 paper copies of Opening Brief [ # 8 ] filed by Mr. Anthony J. Johnson. [12196219] (SD) [Entered: 08/09/2021 04:15 PM] |
| Filing 11 Received 3 paper copies of excerpts of record [ # 9 ] in 5 volume(s) and index volume filed by Appellant Mr. Anthony J. Johnson. [12195548] (KWG) [Entered: 08/09/2021 11:55 AM] |
| Filing 10 Filed clerk order: The opening brief [ # 8 ] submitted by Mr. Anthony J. Johnson is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 6 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification (attached to the end of each copy of the brief) that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: not applicable. The excerpts of record [ # 9 ] submitted by Mr. Anthony J. Johnson are filed. Within 7 days of this order, filer is ordered to file 3 copies of the excerpts in paper format securely bound on the left side, with white covers. The paper copies shall be submitted to the principal office of the Clerk. [12190503] (LA) [Entered: 08/03/2021 10:43 AM] |
| Filing 9 Submitted (ECF) excerpts of record. Submitted by Appellant Mr. Anthony J. Johnson. Date of service: 08/02/2021. [12190051] [21-55614] (Johnson, Anthony) [Entered: 08/02/2021 05:38 PM] |
| Filing 8 Submitted (ECF) Opening Brief for review. Submitted by Appellant Mr. Anthony J. Johnson. Date of service: 08/02/2021. [12190036] [21-55614] (Johnson, Anthony) [Entered: 08/02/2021 05:20 PM] |
| Filing 7 Filed order MEDIATION (KS): This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant settlement discussions. [12177540] (AF) [Entered: 07/20/2021 10:34 AM] |
| Filing 6 Added Attorney(s) Paul Andrew Tyrell, Sean Michael Sullivan for party(s) Appellee Storix, Inc., in case 21-55614. [12175075] (DJV) [Entered: 07/16/2021 03:02 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed (ECF) Appellees Sean Sullivan and Paul Tyrell Correspondence: Clarification of Representation re Defendant-Appellee Paul Tyrell and Defendant-Appellee Sean Sullivan. Date of service: 07/16/2021 [12175043] [21-55614] (Hall, Kendra) [Entered: 07/16/2021 02:51 PM] |
| Filing 4 Attorneys Sean Michael Sullivan, Sean Michael Sullivan and Sean Michael Sullivan in 21-55614 substituted by Attorneys Kendra J. Hall, Kendra J. Hall and Kendra J. Hall in 21-55614 [12174921] (DJV) [Entered: 07/16/2021 02:04 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Kendra J. Hall (Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLP) for Appellees Sean Sullivan and Paul Tyrell. Substitution for Mr. Sean Michael Sullivan for Appellees Storix, Inc., Sean Sullivan and Paul Tyrell and Paul Andrew Tyrell for Appellees Storix, Inc., Sean Sullivan and Paul Tyrell. Date of service: 07/16/2021. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12174911] [21-55614] (Hall, Kendra) [Entered: 07/16/2021 01:59 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed order MEDIATION (CL): The Mediation Program of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals facilitates settlement while appeals are pending. See Fed. R. App. P. 33 and Ninth Cir. R. 33-1. As part of a pilot project, the Mediation Program is exploring settlement potential in some cases in which one party is proceeding pro se (representing themselves without the assistance of an attorney). This case is being included in the pilot project. The court has scheduled a dial-in telephone assessment conference at the date and time indicated above to explore settlement potential. Participants with an email address on the attached list will receive an email with dial-in information. If an email address is not listed or if there are any changes or additions to the list, please notify the Mediation Office at mediation@ca9.uscourts.gov. Participants may also leave a message at (415) 355-7900 to request dial-in information. Finally, please notify Circuit Mediator Kay Suk immediately by email (kay_suk@ca9.uscourts.gov) if a participant has an unavoidable scheduling conflict. Please copy all participants on any such communications. All emails should include the Ninth Circuit case name and number in the subject line. All written or spoken communication with the mediator, including the discussions during the scheduled conference, are strictly confidential mediation communications protected by Ninth Circuit Rule 33-1 and cannot be disclosed outside the mediation process. Additional information about confidentiality (including a copy of Ninth Circuit Rule 33-1), the assessment conference, and the Mediation Program are attached and can also be found at the Mediation Program website (www.ca9.uscourts.gov/mediation). The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. (Date: July 19, 2021 Time: 10:00 a.m. Pacific Time) (SEE ORDER FOR FULL TEXT) [12162323] (AF) [Entered: 07/02/2021 04:55 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Anthony J. Johnson opening brief due 08/09/2021. Appellees Manuel Altamirano, et al. answering brief due 09/08/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12143055] (JPD) [Entered: 06/14/2021 10:44 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
