USA v. Frank Agrama
Petitioner: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Respondent: FRANK AGRAMA
Case Number: 21-55657
Filed: June 23, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 4, 2021 Filing 15 Filed (ECF) Appellee USA reply to response (). Date of service: 08/04/2021. [12191694] [21-55657] (Dale, Ivan) [Entered: 08/04/2021 11:00 AM]
July 29, 2021 Filing 14 Filed (ECF) Appellant Frank Agrama response to motion ([ # 12 ] Motion (ECF Filing), [ # 12 ] Motion (ECF Filing) motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction). Date of service: 07/29/2021. [12186360] [21-55657] (Benedetto, Matthew) [Entered: 07/29/2021 09:24 AM]
July 19, 2021 Filing 13 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant settlement discussions while the appeal is pending. [12177161] (CL) [Entered: 07/19/2021 07:10 PM]
July 19, 2021 Filing 12 Filed (ECF) Appellee USA Motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. Date of service: 07/19/2021. [12176529] [21-55657] (Dale, Ivan) [Entered: 07/19/2021 02:44 PM]
July 19, 2021 Filing 11 Added Attorney(s) Michael J. Haungs for party(s) Appellee USA. [12175977] (RL) [Entered: 07/19/2021 10:57 AM]
July 19, 2021 Filing 10 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Michael J. Haungs (co-counsel) (U.S. Department of Justice, P.O. Box 502, Washington, DC 20044) for Appellee USA. Date of service: 07/19/2021. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12175971] [21-55657] (Haungs, Michael) [Entered: 07/19/2021 10:55 AM]
July 6, 2021 Filing 9 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: By 07/20/2021, counsel to email Circuit Mediator regarding settlement potential. Include Ninth Circuit case name and number in subject line. This communication will be kept confidential, if requested, and should not be filed with the court. The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. [12164250] (CL) [Entered: 07/06/2021 04:59 PM]
July 1, 2021 Filing 8 Attorney Amy Talburt Matchison substituted by Attorney Ivan Clay Dale. [12160058] (RL) [Entered: 07/01/2021 09:32 AM]
July 1, 2021 Filing 7 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Ivan C. Dale (U.S. Department of Justice, Tax Division, Appellate Section, P.O. Box 502, Washington, DC 20044) for Appellee USA. Substitution for Attorney Amy Talburt Matchison, Esquire for Appellee USA. Date of service: 07/01/2021. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12160041] [21-55657] (Dale, Ivan) [Entered: 07/01/2021 09:26 AM]
June 30, 2021 Filing 6 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 06/30/2021. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12158542]. [21-55657] (AD) [Entered: 06/30/2021 06:44 AM]
June 30, 2021 Filing 5 Filed (ECF) Appellant Frank Agrama Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 06/30/2021. [12158536] [21-55657] (Benedetto, Matthew) [Entered: 06/30/2021 06:34 AM]
June 23, 2021 Filing 4 Added Attorney(s) David Lehn, Matthew Benedetto for party(s) Appellant Frank Agrama. [12152580] (RL) [Entered: 06/23/2021 03:40 PM]
June 23, 2021 Filing 3 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Matthew D. Benedetto (Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, 350 South Grand Avenue Suite 2400, Los Angeles, CA 90071) for Appellant Frank Agrama. Date of service: 06/23/2021. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12152566] [21-55657] (Benedetto, Matthew) [Entered: 06/23/2021 03:38 PM]
June 23, 2021 Filing 2 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of David M Lehn (Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, 1875 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20006) for Appellant Frank Agrama. Date of service: 06/23/2021. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12152545] [21-55657] (Lehn, David) [Entered: 06/23/2021 03:29 PM]
June 23, 2021 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Frank Agrama Mediation Questionnaire due on 06/30/2021. Appellant Frank Agrama opening brief due 08/25/2021. Appellee United States of America answering brief due 09/27/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12151788] (RT) [Entered: 06/23/2021 09:45 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: USA v. Frank Agrama
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: FRANK AGRAMA
Represented By: David Lehn
Represented By: Matthew Benedetto
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Amy Talburt Matchison Esquire
Represented By: Ivan Clay Dale
Represented By: Michael J. Haungs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?