Carl Bennett v. Felicia Ponce, et al
| MARCOS AIRD, Staff Physician Assistant, individual, FELICIA PONCE, Warden, Terminal Island FCI, individuals, EVELYN CASTRO, M.D. / C.D., Staff Physician, individual, TROY MATTHEWS, Staff Physician Assistant, individual and MEDICAL STAFF AT TERMINAL ISLAND |
| CARL BENNETT |
| 21-55679 |
| June 28, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| CARL BENNETT V. FELICIA PONCE, ET AL |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Filed Appellant Carl Bennett letter dated re: Mediation. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12208825] (JFF) [Entered: 08/23/2021 02:06 PM] |
| Filing 8 Filed Appellant Carl Bennett letter dated re: case information. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12204068] (JFF) [Entered: 08/17/2021 03:40 PM] |
| Filing 7 Filed order MEDIATION (RSK): This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. [12195805] (JPD) [Entered: 08/09/2021 01:43 PM] |
| Filing 6 Filed order MEDIATION (RSK): The Mediation Program of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals facilitates settlement while appeals are pending. See Fed. R. App. P. 33 and Ninth Cir. R. 33-1. As part of a pilot project, the Mediation Program is exploring settlement potential in some cases in which one party is proceeding pro se (representing themselves without the assistance of an attorney). This case is being included in the pilot project. By August 3, 2021, the parties are requested to inform the Circuit Mediator in writing whether the issues on appeal or the underlying dispute might be appropriate for settlement discussions. The written response to this order and all future written or spoken communication with the mediator are strictly confidential mediation communications protected by Ninth Circuit Rule 33-1 . and cannot be disclosed outside the mediation process. The written response to this order should not be filed with the court; instead, the response should be sent directly to the Circuit Mediator by email (robert_kaiser@ca9.uscourts.gov) or mail (Robert Kaiser, Circuit Mediation Office, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, James R. Browning United States Courthouse, P.O. Box 193939, San Francisco, CA 94119-3939). More detailed information about the Mediation Program and its procedures are included in the attachment to this order and on the Mediation Program web site (www.ca9.uscourts.gov/mediation). The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. [12172918] (OC) [Entered: 07/14/2021 04:48 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed Appellant Carl Bennett letter dated re: Request docket sheet(sent). Paper filing deficiency: None. [12171654] (JFF) [Entered: 07/13/2021 04:25 PM] |
| Filing 4 Received notice of change of address dated from Carl Bennett. New address: FCI - FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION - COLEMAN Low P.O. Box 1031 Coleman, FL 33521. [12171649] (JFF) [Entered: 07/13/2021 04:23 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Appellant Carl Bennett motion to appoint counsel. Deficiencies: None. [12171643] (JFF) [Entered: 07/13/2021 04:20 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed Appellant Carl Bennett motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. [12171635] (JFF) [Entered: 07/13/2021 04:15 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Felicia Ponce et al. answering brief due 09/13/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12156396] (JPD) [Entered: 06/28/2021 02:11 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
